Case Law
Available documents (98)
sorted by (Date of decision descending) Add to selection
Quick view
Refine your search
France / 10 January 2023 / France, Cour d'appel de Paris (Court of Appeal of Paris) / République de Moldavie v. Société Stileks Scientific and Production Firm LLC intervenante volontaire à titre principal pour la société Komstroy / 18/14721
Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country France Court France, Cour d'appel de Paris (Court of Appeal of Paris) Date 01 February 2022 Parties Société Armamenti e Aerospzio SpA v. Government of the Republic of Iraq Ministry of Justice Case number 19/22977 Applicable NYC Provisions II | II(3) Source Registry of the Court
Languages French affirmed by : Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6780&opac_view=2 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country France Court France, Cour d'appel de Rouen (Court of Appeal of Rouen) Date 24 November 2021 Parties Société Doosan Infracore Europe sro v. Société Acierinox Matériel SASU and S.A.S. SOFEMAT Case number 21/02677 Source Registry of the Court
Languages French affirms : Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6779&opac_view=2 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country France Court France, Conseil d’État (French Council of State) Date 20 July 2021 Parties Sociétés Tecnimont SpA and TCM FR SA v. Société Fosmax LNG Case number 443342 Applicable NYC Provisions V Source Registry of the Court
Languages French see also : Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6778&opac_view=2 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country France Court France, Cour d'appel de Paris (Court of Appeal of Paris) Date 15 June 2021 Parties CNAN Group SPA and Société International Bulk Carrier SPA (IBC) v. SARL CTI Group Inc. and Société Pharaon Commercial Investment Group Limited Case number 20/07999 Applicable NYC Provisions I | I(2) | II | II(2) Source Registry of the Court
Languages French Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6777&opac_view=2 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country France Court France, Tribunal de commerce de Rouen (Commercial Court of Rouen) Date 09 June 2021 Parties Acierinox Matériel (SASU) v. Doosan Infracore Europe s.r.o. and SOFEMAT (SAS) Case number 2021 001841 Source Registry of the Court
Languages French affirmed by : Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6776&opac_view=2 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country France Court France, Cour de cassation (French Court of Cassation) Date 13 January 2021 Parties Société Egyptian General Petroleum Corporation (EGPC) v. Société National Gas Company (NATGAS) Case number 19-22.932 Applicable NYC Provisions VII | VII(1) Source Original decision obtained from the registry of the Cour de cassation
Languages French affirms : Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6775&opac_view=2 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country France Court France, Cour d’appel de Poitiers (Court of Appeal of Poitiers) Date 24 November 2020 Parties Urs Wildberger v. SA SPBI and Société Simpson Marine Limited Case number 18/01230 Applicable NYC Provisions II | II(3) Source Registry of the Court
Languages French Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6606&opac_view=2 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country France Court France, Cour d’appel de Versailles (Court of Appeal of Versailles) Date 12 March 2020 Parties Société Euro Herramientas v. Société The Stanley Works Limited Case number 19/07463 Applicable NYC Provisions II Source Registry of the Court
Languages French Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6339&opac_view=2 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country France Court France, Cour d'appel de Paris (Court of Appeal of Paris) Date 07 January 2020 Parties République démocratique du Congo v. Société Divine Inspiration Group (Pty) Case number 19/07260 Applicable NYC Provisions V | V(1) | V(1)(e) Source Registry of the Court
Languages French Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5677&opac_view=2 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country France Court France, Cour d'appel de Paris (Court of Appeal of Paris) Date 22 October 2019 Parties Fédération de Russie v. JSC Oschadbank Case number 19/04161 Applicable NYC Provisions V | V(1) | V(1)(e) Source Registry of the Court
Languages French Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5643&opac_view=2 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country France Court France, Tribunal de commerce de Versailles (Commercial Court of Versailles) Date 27 September 2019 Parties Euro Herramientas S.A.U. v. The Stanley Works Limited Case number 2018F00474 Applicable NYC Provisions II Source Registry of the Court
Languages French Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5731&opac_view=2 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country France Court France, Cour d'appel de Paris (Court of Appeal of Paris) Date 05 September 2019 Parties Société Mohamed Abdel Moshen Al-Kharafi et Fils v. Société Libyan Investment Authority and Société Libyan Arab Foreign Investment Company Case number 18/17592 Applicable NYC Provisions III Source Registry of the Court
Languages French Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6078&opac_view=2 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country France Court France, Cour d'appel de Paris (Court of Appeal of Paris) Date 21 May 2019 Parties Société Egyptian General Petroleum Corporation v. Société National Gas Company (NATGAS) Case number 17/19850 Applicable NYC Provisions VII | VII(1) Source Registry of the Court
Languages French affirmed by : Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5503&opac_view=2 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country France Court France, Cour d’appel de Versailles (Court of Appeal of Versailles) Date 06 April 2018 Parties Syndicat Mixte des Aéroports de Charente (SMAC) v. Société Ryanair Limited and Société Airport Marketing Services Limited Case number 17/03565 Source Registry of the Court
Languages French see also : Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5237&opac_view=2 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country France Court France, Cour d'appel de Paris (Court of Appeal of Paris) Date 13 February 2018 Parties Société Strube GmbH & Co. KG v. Société SESVanderHave Case number 15/17137 Applicable NYC Provisions V | V(1) | V(1)(e) Source Registry of the Court
Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=4584&opac_view=2 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country France Court France, Cour d'appel de Paris (Court of Appeal of Paris) Date 10 November 2017 Parties Société Briqueterie Taghaste v. SCP BTSG and others Case number 16/14744 Source Registry of the Court
Languages French Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5317&opac_view=2 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country France Court France, Tribunal des conflits (Jurisdictional Conflicts Tribunal) Date 24 April 2017 Case number 4075 Applicable NYC Provisions III | V | VII Source Registry of the Court
Languages French Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5236&opac_view=2 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country France Court France, Conseil d’État (French Council of State) Date 09 November 2016 Parties Société Fosmax LNG v. Société TCM FR, Société Tecnimont and Société Saipem Case number 388806 Applicable NYC Provisions V Source Registry of the Court
see also : Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=3678&opac_view=2 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country France Court France, Cour d'appel de Paris (Court of Appeal of Paris) Date 27 September 2016 Parties Société Ancienne Maison Marcel Bauche v. Société Indagro Case number 15/12614 Applicable NYC Provisions V | V(2) | V(2)(b) Source Registry of the Court
Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=3647&opac_view=2 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country France Court France, Cour de cassation (French Court of Cassation) Date 08 July 2015 Parties Société Ryanair Limited and Société Airport Marketing Services Limited v. Syndicat Mixte des Aéroports de Charente (SMAC) and Procureur général près la Cour d’appel de Paris Case number 13-25.846 Applicable NYC Provisions III | V | VII Source Original decision obtained from the registry of the Cour d'appel de Paris
see also : Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=1715&opac_view=2 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country France Court France, Cour d'appel de Paris (Court of Appeal of Paris) Date 14 April 2015 Parties Etat du Mali v. Société Groupe Tomota Case number 14/05996 Applicable NYC Provisions VI Source Original decision obtained from the registry of the Cour d'appel de Paris
Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=1714&opac_view=2 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country France Court France, Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre (Commercial Court of Nanterre) Date 19 June 2014 Parties Société Farmex Technologies v. Foreign Financing Projects Management Center of the Ministry of Finance (FFPMC), et al. Case number 2012R01140 Applicable NYC Provisions V | V(1) | V(1)(e) Source Registry of the Court
Languages French Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5235&opac_view=2 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country France Court France, Cour d'appel de Paris (Court of Appeal of Paris) Date 24 November 2011 Parties Société Egyptian General Petroleum Corporation (EGPC) v. Société National Gas Company (NATCAS) Case number 10/16525 Applicable NYC Provisions VII | VII(1) Source Original decision obtained from the registry of the Cour d'appel de Paris
Languages English Language(s) French Summary A gas supply contract was concluded between an Egyptian public entity (Egyptian General Petroleum Corporation - EGPC) and another Egyptian company (National Gas Company - NATGAS). NATGAS subscribed various US dollar denominated loans in the context of the transaction. A decree subsequently cancelled the Egyptian currency's parity with the US dollar, which increased the financial burden upon NATGAS. EGPC refused to bear these additional costs and NATGAS filed a Request for arbitration before the Regional Commercial Arbitration Center of Cairo. In an award dated 12 September 2009, the arbitral tribunal ruled in favor of NATGAS. In an order issued on 19 May 2010, the President of the Tribunal de Grande Instance de Paris (First Instance Court of Paris) allowed enforcement of the award. EGPC appealed this decision on several grounds: (i) the award had been annulled by the Egyptian Courts, (ii) the arbitration agreement was void or nonexistent, (iii) violation of due process, (iv) violation of international public policy. The Cour d'appel de Paris (Paris Court of Appeal) first stated that Articles 1498 et seq. of the Code of Civil Procedure (i.e. now Articles 1514 and et seq. pursuant to the French Decree of 13 January 2011) apply to both international arbitral awards and arbitral awards rendered abroad. In accordance with Article VII NYC, it ruled that French law is applicable as being more favorable than the NYC (given than it does not provide the setting aside of a foreign award as a ground for non-enforcement) and rejected EGPC's claim based on Articles 1502 5° of the Code of Civil Procedure (i.e. now Articles 1514 and 1520 5°). It also dismissed the other claims raised by EGPC and upheld the enforcement of the award. Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=396&opac_view=2 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country France Court France, Cour d'appel de Paris (Court of Appeal of Paris) Date 09 June 2011 Parties Société Facciano Giuseppe v. Société Coopérative Agricole Nouricia Case number 10/11062 Applicable NYC Provisions II | I Source Original decision obtained from the registry of the Cour d’appel de Paris
Languages English Summary An Italian company (Facciano Giuseppe) and a French company (Coopérative Agricole Nouricia) entered into five contracts for the sale of wheat. The contracts were concluded under the Incograin form via a merchandise broker, which contained an arbitration clause. A dispute arose and Nouricia filed a Request for arbitration before the Chambre arbitrale de Paris (Arbitral Chamber of Paris). In a final award dated 29 July 2009, the arbitral tribunal ruled in favor of Nouricia. Facciano Giuseppe initiated proceedings to set aside the award before the Cour d'appel de Paris (Paris Court of Appeal). It argued that the award should be annulled pursuant to Article 1502 1° of the Code of Civil Procedure (i.e. now Article 1520 1°, pursuant to French Decree of 13 January 2011), claiming that the arbitral tribunal ruled in the absence of an arbitration agreement. In this respect, its claim was based on Article 1443 of the Code of Civil Procedure and Articles I and II NYC which provide that, in order to be valid, an arbitration agreement shall be in writing. The Cour d'appel de Paris held that the NYC did not apply to the case at hand since the award was rendered in Paris. Given that all the written confirmations of the contracts referred to the General Conditions of the Incograin form and to the arbitration agreement contained therein, it ruled that the arbitration agreement was valid and rejected the action to set aside the award. Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=426&opac_view=2 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
