Generic terms
sorted by (Publication date descending, Resource ascending) Add to selection
Quick view
Refine your search
Guide
Available documents (753)
sorted by (Publication date descending, Resource ascending) Add to selection
Quick view
Refine your search
Canada / 22 April 2002 / Canada, Court of Queen’s Bench of Manitoba / Sheldon Proctor v. Leon Schellenberg / CI 01-01-23778
Country Canada Court Canada, Court of Queen’s Bench of Manitoba Date 22 April 2002 Parties Sheldon Proctor v. Leon Schellenberg Case number CI 01-01-23778 Applicable NYC Provisions I | I(1) | II | II(2) | IV | IV(1) | V | V(1) | V(2) | V(2)(a) | VI Source 2002 MBQB 135 | online: CanLII
Languages English affirmed by : Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5395&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Spain Court Spain, Tribunal Supremo (Supreme Court) Date 12 March 2002 Parties D. Braulio v. Travelplan S.A. Case number ATS 5385/2002 Applicable NYC Provisions I | I(3) | II | IV | IV(1) | IV(1)(a) | IV(1)(b) | V | V(1) | V(2) | V(2)(a) | V(2)(b) Source Consejo General del Poder Judicial (Centro de Documentación Judicial – CENDOJ)
Languages Spanish Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=4041&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Spain Court Spain, Tribunal Supremo (Supreme Court) Date 26 February 2002 Parties Strategic Bulk Carriers Inc. v. Sociedad Ibérica de Molturación S.A. Case number ATS 4671/2002 Applicable NYC Provisions I | II | IV | IV(1) | IV(1)(b) | V | V(1) | V(1)(a) | V(2) | V(2)(a) | V(2)(b) Source Consejo General del Poder Judicial (Centro de Documentación Judicial – CENDOJ)
Languages Spanish Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=4042&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Hungary Court Hungary, Kúria (Supreme Court of Hungary) Case number EBH2002.773 Applicable NYC Provisions I | I(1) | I(2) | II | II(1) | II(2) | III | IV | IV(1) | IV(2) | V | V(1) | V(1)(b) | V(1)(e) | V(2) | V(2)(b) Source http://www.kuria-birosag.hu (website of the Supreme Court of Hungary)
Languages Hungarian affirmed by : Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5313&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Austria Court Austria, Oberster Gerichtshof (Supreme Court) Date 22 October 2001 Parties C**** Handelsgesellschaft m.b.H. v. S**** GmbH Case number 1Ob236/01i Applicable NYC Provisions V | V(1) | V(1)(a) | V(1)(d) | V(1)(e) | V(2) | V(2)(a) Source Languages German Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=3889&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Spain Court Spain, Tribunal Supremo (Supreme Court) Date 02 October 2001 Parties Fortum Engineering OY-o Ltd v. Global Steel Wire S.A. Case number ATS 1173/2001 Applicable NYC Provisions I | II | IV | IV(1) | IV(1)(a) | IV(1)(b) | V | V(1) | V(1)(a) | V(1)(c) | V(2) | V(2)(a) | V(2)(b) Source Consejo General del Poder Judicial (Centro de Documentación Judicial – CENDOJ)
Languages Spanish Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=4044&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Spain Court Spain, Tribunal Supremo (Supreme Court) Date 29 May 2001 Parties Bor Glassworks v. Cristalglass S.A. Case number ATS 110/2001 Applicable NYC Provisions I | III | IV | V | V(1) | V(2) Source Consejo General del Poder Judicial (Centro de Documentación Judicial – CENDOJ)
Languages Spanish Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=4045&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Spain Court Spain, Tribunal Supremo (Supreme Court) Date 20 March 2001 Parties Ángel v. Bernardo Alfageme S.A. Case number ATS 695/2001 Applicable NYC Provisions I | IV | V | V(2) | V(2)(a) | V(2)(b) Source Consejo General del Poder Judicial (Centro de Documentación Judicial – CENDOJ)
Languages Spanish Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=4047&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Spain Court Spain, Tribunal Supremo (Supreme Court) Date 13 March 2001 Parties Project XJ200 Ltd v. H. Capital S.A. (Portic S.A.) Case number ATS 773/2001 Applicable NYC Provisions I | II | IV | IV(1) | IV(1)(a) | IV(1)(b) | IV(2) | V | V(1) | V(1)(d) | V(2) | V(2)(a) | V(2)(b) Source Consejo General del Poder Judicial (Centro de Documentación Judicial – CENDOJ)
Languages Spanish Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=4048&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Korea Court Korea, Seoul High Court Date 27 February 2001 Parties K&V International EMB Co., Ltd. v. Korea Special Precision Machinery Co., Ltd. Case number 2000Na23725 Applicable NYC Provisions I | I(1) | V | V(1) | V(1)(c) | V(2) | V(2)(b) Source Languages Korean reversed by : see also : Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6416&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Spain Court Spain, Tribunal Supremo (Supreme Court) Date 20 February 2001 Parties Consmaremma-Consorzio tra produttori agricoli-Soc. Coop. a r.l. v. Hermanos Escot Madrid S.A. Case number ATS 758/2001 Applicable NYC Provisions I | II | IV | IV(1) | IV(1)(b) | V | V(1) | V(1)(a) | V(1)(b) | V(1)(c) | V(1)(d) | V(2) Source Consejo General del Poder Judicial (Centro de Documentación Judicial – CENDOJ)
Languages Spanish Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=4049&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Spain Court Spain, Tribunal Supremo (Supreme Court) Date 19 December 2000 Parties General Feeds Incorporated v. Lumar Barcelona S.A. Case number ATS 1677/2000 Applicable NYC Provisions II | II(2) | IV | IV(1) | IV(1)(b) | V | V(2) | V(2)(a) | V(2)(b) Source Consejo General del Poder Judicial (Centro de Documentación Judicial – CENDOJ)
Languages Spanish Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=4050&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Spain Court Spain, Tribunal Supremo (Supreme Court) Date 28 November 2000 Parties Precious Stones Shipping Limited v. Querqus Alimentaria S.L. Case number ATS 1239/2000 Applicable NYC Provisions I | II | II(2) | IV | IV(1) | IV(1)(a) | IV(1)(b) | IV(2) | V | V(1) | V(1)(a) | V(1)(d) | V(2) | V(2)(a) | V(2)(b) Source Consejo General del Poder Judicial (Centro de Documentación Judicial – CENDOJ)
Languages Spanish Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=4051&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Switzerland Court Switzerland, Tribunale Federale (Federal Tribunal) Date 29 August 2000 Parties B. SA v. S. Case number 5P.246/2000 Applicable NYC Provisions V | V(1) | V(1)(e) | V(2) | V(2)(b) Source http://www.bger.ch (website of Swiss Federal Tribunal)
Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=4589&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Spain Court Spain, Tribunal Supremo (Supreme Court) Date 31 July 2000 Parties E. Schubert & Sohn GmbH & Co. v. Golden Foods S.A. Case number ATS 2485/2000 Applicable NYC Provisions I | II | II(1) | II(2) | IV | IV(1) | IV(1)(a) | IV(1)(b) | V | V(1) | V(1)(b) | V(1)(c) | V(2) Source Consejo General del Poder Judicial (Centro de Documentación Judicial – CENDOJ)
Languages Spanish Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=4052&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Spain Court Spain, Tribunal Supremo (Supreme Court) Date 31 July 2000 Parties Ionian Shipping Line Co. Ltd v. Transhipping S.A. Case number ATS 827/2000 Applicable NYC Provisions I | II | IV | IV(1) | IV(1)(b) | V | V(1) | V(1)(a) | V(1)(b) | V(1)(d) | V(2) | V(2)(a) Source Consejo General del Poder Judicial (Centro de Documentación Judicial – CENDOJ)
Languages Spanish Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=4053&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Spain Court Spain, Tribunal Supremo (Supreme Court) Date 04 July 2000 Parties Cardinal Shipping Co. Ltd v. Iberica de Proteínas S.A. Case number ATS 710/2000 Applicable NYC Provisions I | III | IV | V | V(1) | V(2) Source Consejo General del Poder Judicial (Centro de Documentación Judicial – CENDOJ)
Languages Spanish Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=4054&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Spain Court Spain, Tribunal Supremo (Supreme Court) Date 20 June 2000 Parties Danske Mejeriers Faellesorganisation v. Agraria del Tormes S.A., D. Jose Daniel, D. Gregorio and D. Juan Pablo Case number ATS 2432/2000 Applicable NYC Provisions I | V | V(1) | V(1)(a) | V(2) | V(2)(a) | V(2)(b) Source Consejo General del Poder Judicial (Centro de Documentación Judicial – CENDOJ)
Languages Spanish Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=4055&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Spain Court Spain, Tribunal Supremo (Supreme Court) Date 18 April 2000 Parties Agroindustrias Unidas de México, Sociedad Anónima de Capital Variable v. Medicafé S.A. Case number ATS 1418/2000 Applicable NYC Provisions I | II | IV | IV(1) | IV(1)(b) | V | V(1) | V(1)(a) | V(1)(b) | V(1)(d) | V(2) | V(2)(a) Source Consejo General del Poder Judicial (Centro de Documentación Judicial – CENDOJ)
Languages Spanish Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=4062&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Spain Court Spain, Tribunal Supremo (Supreme Court) Date 11 April 2000 Parties Unión Générale de Cinema S.A. v. X Y Z Desarrollos S.A. Case number ATS 859/2000 Applicable NYC Provisions I | II | IV | IV(1) | IV(1)(b) | V | V(1) | V(1)(a) | V(1)(b) | V(1)(d) | V(2) | V(2)(a) | V(2)(b) Source Consejo General del Poder Judicial (Centro de Documentación Judicial – CENDOJ)
Languages Spanish Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=4065&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Spain Court Spain, Tribunal Supremo (Supreme Court) Date 28 March 2000 Parties Kil Management A/S v. J. García Carrión S.A. Case number ATS 238/2000 Applicable NYC Provisions I | II | II(2) | IV | IV(1) | IV(1)(a) | IV(1)(b) | V | V(1) | V(1)(a) | V(1)(b) | V(1)(c) | V(1)(d) | V(2) Source Consejo General del Poder Judicial (Centro de Documentación Judicial – CENDOJ)
Languages Spanish Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=4066&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Spain Court Spain, Tribunal Supremo (Supreme Court) Date 21 March 2000 Parties Dee Baylis Ltd v. Curtidos Gregori S.A. Case number ATS 687/2000 Applicable NYC Provisions I | II | IV | IV(1) | IV(1)(a) | V | V(1) | V(1)(a) | V(1)(b) | V(1)(d) | V(2) Source Consejo General del Poder Judicial (Centro de Documentación Judicial – CENDOJ)
Languages Spanish Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=4067&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Switzerland Court Switzerland, Tribunal fédéral (Federal Tribunal) Date 21 March 2000 Case number 5P.371/1999 Applicable NYC Provisions V | V(1) | V(1)(e) | V(2) | V(2)(b) Source http://www.bger.ch (website of Swiss Federal Tribunal)
Languages English Summary An arbitration tribunal in London ordered B to pay S; relying on that award, S applied to the High Court in London for B to be wound up. The High Court so ordered but its decision was reversed on appeal because there was a counterclaim from B against S which remained undecided. S sought to enforce the award in Switzerland; the decision of the Tribunal of First Instance to enforce the award was reversed on appeal on the basis of the Court of Appeal’s decision in London. S appealed. The Swiss Federal Tribunal allowed the appeal. Considering Article V(1)(e) NYC, the Tribunal stated that ‘recognition and enforcement must be refused if the award has been suspended’ in the country of origin. It noted that the decision of the Court of Appeal in London did not amount to a suspension of the award’s enforcement and that the Court of Appeal did not cast doubt on the award’s validity. Article V(1)(e) NYC was therefore inapplicable (2.b) Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=565&opac_view=6 Attachment (2)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Unofficial TranslationAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Spain Court Spain, Tribunal Supremo (Supreme Court) Date 08 February 2000 Parties Vinalmar S.A. v. Gaspar Peral y Cía S.L. Case number ATS 16/2000 Applicable NYC Provisions I | II | IV | IV(1) | IV(1)(a) | IV(1)(b) | IV(2) | V | V(1) | V(1)(a) | V(1)(d) | V(2) | V(2)(a) | V(2)(b) Source Consejo General del Poder Judicial (Centro de Documentación Judicial – CENDOJ)
Languages Spanish Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=4068&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Spain Court Spain, Tribunal Supremo (Supreme Court) Date 01 February 2000 Parties Project XJ220 LTD v. D. Federicoa Case number ATS 469/2000 Applicable NYC Provisions I | II | IV | IV(1) | IV(1)(a) | IV(1)(b) | IV(2) | V | V(1) | V(1)(b) | V(2) | V(2)(a) | V(2)(b) Source Consejo General del Poder Judicial (Centro de Documentación Judicial – CENDOJ)
Languages Spanish Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=4070&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Spain Court Spain, Tribunal Supremo (Supreme Court) Date 21 December 1999 Parties Ibermat S.A.R.L. v. Guascor S.A. Case number ATS 2130/1999 Applicable NYC Provisions V | V(2) | V(2)(b) Source Consejo General del Poder Judicial (Centro de Documentación Judicial – CENDOJ)
Languages Spanish Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=4071&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Spain Court Spain, Tribunal Supremo (Supreme Court) Date 04 May 1999 Parties Finora Canadá Ltd v. Productos agrícolas Cano S.A. Case number ATS 949/1999 Applicable NYC Provisions I | II | II(2) | IV | IV(1) | IV(1)(a) | IV(1)(b) | V | V(2) Source Consejo General del Poder Judicial (Centro de Documentación Judicial – CENDOJ)
Languages Spanish Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=4075&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Cyprus Court Cyprus, Ανώτατο Δικαστήριο Κύπρου (Supreme Court of Cyprus) Date 28 April 1999 Parties Γενικός Εισαγγελέας της Δημοκρατίας της Κένυας εκ μέρους και για λογαριασμό της Δημοκρατίας της Κένυας (Attorney General of the Republic of Kenya on behalf of the Republic of Kenya) v. Bank für Arbeit und Wirtschaft AG Case number Civil Appeal No. 10071 Applicable NYC Provisions V | V(1) | V(1)(e) | V(2) | VI Source http://www.cylaw.org (CyLaw website)
Languages Greek, Modern (1453-) Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6651&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Hong Kong Court Hong Kong, Court of Final Appeal, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Date 09 February 1999 Parties Hebei Import & Export Corporation v. Polytek Engineering Company Limited Case number FACV 10/1998 Applicable NYC Provisions V | V(1) | V(1)(e) | V(2) | V(2)(b) Source [1999] 1 HKLRD 665; [1999] 2 HKCFAR 111 | http://www.judiciary.gov.hk (website of the Judiciary of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China)
Languages English Summary On March 29, 1996, an arbitral tribunal within the China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission rendered an award in favor of plaintiff-appellant, Hebei Import & Export Corporation (“Hebei”) and against defendant-appellee, Polytek Engineering Company (“Polytek”). Hebei obtained an order to enforce the award in Hong Kong on July 23, 1996. The Court of Appeal allowed Polytek’s appeal (based on Section 44 of the Arbitration Ordinance, which implements Article V NYC) to set aside the enforcement order on the grounds that (1) the Tribunal exhibited apparent bias; (2) this bias constituted a fundamental flaw in the arbitral procedure; and (3) it would be contrary to Hong Kong’s public policy to enforce an award that was the product of such a flawed proceeding. Hebei appealed. The Court of Final Appeal reversed the lower court's decision, finding that Polytek could have raised the issue of potential bias before the Tribunal but chose not to do so. As such, Polytek was estopped from now claiming that the Tribunal’s apparent bias violated Hong Kong public policy. The Court noted that refusing to enforce a Convention award requires a high burden of proof, unmet by Polytek in this case. reverses : see also :
- V(2) / V(2)(b) / 2. ANALYSIS (V(2)(b)) / b. Ex officio review, burden of proof and standard of proof / §55
- V(2) / V(2)(b) / 2. ANALYSIS (V(2)(b)) / c. Relationship with article V(1) / §45
- V(2) / V(2)(b) / 2. ANALYSIS (V(2)(b)) / b. International – transnational public policy / §14
- V(2) / V(2)(b) / 2. ANALYSIS (V(2)(b)) / a. The public policy exception under the Convention / §6
- V(2) / V(2)(b) / 2. ANALYSIS (V(2)(b)) / b. Ex officio review, burden of proof and standard of proof / §59
- V(2) / V(2)(b) / 2. ANALYSIS (V(2)(b)) / b. Ex officio review, burden of proof and standard of proof / §57
- V(2) / V(2)(b) / 2. ANALYSIS (V(2)(b)) / a. The public policy exception under the Convention / §5
- Hong Kong / 15 May 1997 / Hong Kong, High Court, In the Supreme Court of Hong Kong / Hebei Import & Export Corporation v. Polytek Engineering Company Limited / HCMP 2083/1996
Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=494&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Spain Court Spain, Tribunal Supremo (Supreme Court) Date 01 December 1998 Parties Lenersan Poortman B.V. v. Salvador Martínez Mari S.L. Case number ATS 968/1998 Applicable NYC Provisions I | II | II(2) | IV | IV(1) | IV(1)(a) | IV(1)(b) | IV(2) | V | V(1) | V(1)(a) | V(2) | V(2)(a) | V(2)(b) Source Consejo General del Poder Judicial (Centro de Documentación Judicial – CENDOJ)
Languages Spanish Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=4077&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
