Available documents (784)
sorted by (Publication date descending, Resource ascending) Add to selection
Quick view
Refine your search
Elina Mereminskaya / Latin America Isn’t ‘Going South’: A Qualitative Sampling Analysis / in Journal of International Arbitration, Kluwer Law International 2022, Volume 39 Issue 3 pp. 433-452 - 01/06/2022
Author(s) Elina Mereminskaya Source in Journal of International Arbitration, Kluwer Law International 2022, Volume 39 Issue 3 pp. 433-452 Subject(s) A. Articles on the 1958 New York Convention Jurisdictions Latin America | Argentina | Colombia | Chile | Mexico | Peru Applicable NYC Provisions III | V(1)(c) | V(2)(b) | IV | VII Worldcat Number Worldcat : 9531412508 
Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6771&opac_view=6
Author(s) Dalma Kovács Source in Dispute Resolution Journal, Kluwer Law International, AAA-ICDR 2022, Volume 76 Issue 1 pp. 115-136 Subject(s) B. Articles on the recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards in specific countries and regions (including book chapters) Jurisdictions Hungary Applicable NYC Provisions IV | V | V(1) | V(1)(a) | V(1)(b) | V(1)(c) | V(1)(d) | V(1)(e) | V(2) | V(2)(a) | V(2)(b) Worldcat Number Worldcat : 9530313212 Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6755&opac_view=6
Author(s) Renato Stephan Grion ; Thiago Del Pozzo Zanelato Source in Arbitration: The International Journal of Arbitration, Mediation and Dispute Management, Kluwer Law International 2021, Volume 87 Issue 2) pp. 153-169 Subject(s) A. Articles on the 1958 New York Convention Applicable NYC Provisions IV | V Worldcat Number Worldcat : 9040553962 Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6721&opac_view=6
- 01/01/2021
Author(s) Fali Nariman ; Marike R.P. Paulsson ; Supritha Suresh Source in Dushyant Dave , Martin Hunter , et al. (eds), Arbitration in India, Kluwer Law International 2021 pp. 261-288
Subject(s) B. Articles on the recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards in specific countries and regions (including book chapters) Jurisdictions India Applicable NYC Provisions V(2) | IV | V | II(2) | I | III | VI | VII Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6749&opac_view=6
United States / 15 December 2020 / United States, U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit / 1:20-cv-20059-RNS / 1:20-cv-20059-RNS
Country United States Court United States, U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit Date 15 December 2020 Parties 1:20-cv-20059-RNS Case number 1:20-cv-20059-RNS Applicable NYC Provisions II | II(2) | IV Source online: PACER
Languages English affirms : Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6581&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country United States Court United States, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas Date 17 November 2020 Parties Waleed Bin Al-Qarqani, et al. v. Arab American Oil Company, et al. Case number 4:18-CV-1807 Applicable NYC Provisions II | IV | V | V(1) | V(1)(c) | V(1)(d) | V(2) Source online: PACER
Languages English see also : Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6575&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country India Court India, Supreme Court Date 16 September 2020 Parties Government of India v. Vedanta Limited, Ravva Oil (Singapore) Pte Ltd and Videocon Industries Limited Case number Civil Appeal No. 3185 of 2020 Applicable NYC Provisions III | IV | IV(1) | V | V(1) | V(1)(e) | V(2) | V(2)(b) Source https://www.sci.gov.in (website of the Supreme Court of India)
Languages English Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6372&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Netherlands Court Netherlands, Gerechtshof Den Haag (Court of Appeal of The Hague) Date 25 August 2020 Parties Seaquest-Infotel Inc. v. Société des télécommunications du Mali S.A. Case number 200.272.114 Applicable NYC Provisions IV | V | V(2) | V(2)(b) Source https://www.rechtspraak.nl (official website of the Netherlands judiciary system)
Languages Dutch Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6607&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Netherlands Court Netherlands, Gerechtshof Den Haag (Court of Appeal of The Hague) Date 17 July 2020 Parties Offshore Support Vessels 12 Pte. Ltd. and Vroon Offshore Services Pte. Ltd. v. Inrada International Subsea Projects B.V. Case number 200.276.881/01 Applicable NYC Provisions IV | IV(1) | IV(2) Source https://www.rechtspraak.nl (official website of the Netherlands judiciary system)
Languages Dutch Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6447&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Netherlands Court Netherlands, Gerechtshof Amsterdam (Court of Appeal of Amsterdam) Date 14 July 2020 Parties 200.224.067/01 Case number 200.224.067/01 Applicable NYC Provisions III | IV | V | V(1) | V(1)(a) | V(1)(b) | V(1)(c) | V(1)(d) | V(2) Source https://www.rechtspraak.nl (official website of the Netherlands judiciary system)
Languages Dutch see also : Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6343&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Lithuania Court Lithuania, Lietuvos Apeliacinis Teismas (Court of Appeal of Lithuania) Date 30 June 2020 Parties Univers Acier Morocco v. PAO “Murmanskoje morskoje parochodstvo” Case number e2T-35-381/2020 Applicable NYC Provisions III | IV | IV(1) | V | V(1) | V(1)(d) | V(2) | V(2)(b) Source https://www.apeliacinis.lt (website of the Court of Appeal of Lithuania)
Languages Lithuanian Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6368&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Netherlands Court Netherlands, Gerechtshof ‘s-Hertogenbosch (Court of Appeal of ‘s-Hertogenbosch) Date 18 June 2020 Case number 200.266.205_01 Applicable NYC Provisions II | III | IV Source https://www.rechtspraak.nl (official website of the Netherlands judiciary system)
Languages Dutch Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6253&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country China Court China, 广州海事法院 (Guangzhou Maritime Court) Date 17 June 2020 Parties 安富尔自由贸易区公司 (Emphor FZCO) v. 广东粤新海洋工程装备股份有限公司 Case number (2020)粤72协外认1号 Applicable NYC Provisions IV | V | V(1) | V(1)(b) | V(1)(c) | V(2) Source http://wenshu.court.gov.cn (China Judgements Online)
Languages Chinese Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6556&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country United States Court United States, U.S. District Court, District of Kansas Date 22 May 2020 Parties Dreymoor Fertilizers Overseas Pte. Ltd. v. AVAgro, LLC and UAB AVAgro Case number 20-mc-0105-EFM-GEB Applicable NYC Provisions IV Source online: PACER
Languages English Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6324&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Cyprus Court Cyprus, Επαρχιακό Δικαστήριο Λευκωσίας (District Court of Nicosia) Date 08 May 2020 Parties Dreamhack AB v. Solser Management Limited Case number General Application No. 110/19 Applicable NYC Provisions IV | V Source http://www.cylaw.org (CyLaw website)
Languages Greek, Modern (1453-) Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6697&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Cyprus Court Cyprus, Επαρχιακό Δικαστήριο Λευκωσίας (District Court of Nicosia) Date 05 May 2020 Parties Smagin v. Kalken Holdings Limited and Yegiazaryan Case number General Application No. 601/2017 Applicable NYC Provisions IV | IV(1) | IV(1)(a) | IV(1)(b) | IV(2) | V | V(2) | V(2)(b) Source http://www.cylaw.org (CyLaw website)
Languages Greek, Modern (1453-) Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6711&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country China Court China, 广东省东莞市中级人民法院 (Guangdong, Dongguan Intermediate People’s Court) Date 30 April 2020 Parties 科兹集团分销有限公司 (Limited Liability Company, Kurgroup Distribution) v. 广东省东莞畜产进出口有限公司 Case number (2019)粤19协外认1号 Applicable NYC Provisions I | II | IV | V | V(1) | V(1)(b) | V(1)(c) Source http://wenshu.court.gov.cn (China Judgements Online)
Languages Chinese Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6553&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Cyprus Court Cyprus, Επαρχιακό Δικαστήριο Λευκωσίας (District Court of Nicosia) Date 30 April 2020 Parties State of Montenegro v. CEAC Holdings Limited Case number General Application No. 58/18 Applicable NYC Provisions IV | V Source http://www.cylaw.org (CyLaw website)
Languages Greek, Modern (1453-) Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6698&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country China Court China, 上海市第一中级人民法院 (Shanghai No. 1 Intermediate People’s Court) Date 16 April 2020 Parties 华联力宝医疗有限公司 (OUE Lippo Healthcare Limited) v. 林高坤 Case number (2019)沪01协外认5号之一 Applicable NYC Provisions I | IV | V Source http://wenshu.court.gov.cn (China Judgements Online)
Languages Chinese Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6552&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Lithuania Court Lithuania, Lietuvos Apeliacinis Teismas (Court of Appeal of Lithuania) Date 09 April 2020 Parties AAB „Mogiliovoblavtotrans“ v. UAB „Seven Miles Logistics“ Case number 2T-33-381/2020 Applicable NYC Provisions III | IV | IV(1) | V | V(1) | V(2) Source https://www.apeliacinis.lt (website of the Court of Appeal of Lithuania)
Languages Lithuanian Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6012&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country United States Court United States, U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit Date 06 April 2020 Parties OJSC Ukrnafta v. Carpatsky Petroleum Corporation Case number 19-20011 Applicable NYC Provisions II | IV | V | V(1) | V(1)(a) | V(1)(b) | V(1)(c) | V(1)(d) | V(1)(e) | V(2)(b) Source online: PACER
Languages English affirms : Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6314&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Lithuania Court Lithuania, Lietuvos Apeliacinis Teismas (Court of Appeal of Lithuania) Date 02 April 2020 Parties UAB „Samčio burtai“ v. UAB „Alsana“ Case number e2T-28-381/2020 Applicable NYC Provisions III | IV | IV(1) | V | V(1) | V(2) Source https://www.apeliacinis.lt (website of the Court of Appeal of Lithuania)
Languages Lithuanian Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6011&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country China Court China, 辽宁省抚顺市中级人民法院 (Liaoning, Fushun Intermediate People’s Court) Date 25 March 2020 Parties （株）KSP (英文名称：KSP Co., Ltd.) v. 抚顺中兴重工有限公司 Case number (2020)辽04民再7号 Applicable NYC Provisions IV | V Source http://wenshu.court.gov.cn (China Judgements Online)
Languages Chinese Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6551&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country China Court China, 山东省烟台市中级人民法院 (Shandong, Yantai Intermediate People’s Court) Date 16 March 2020 Parties 皇家食品进口公司 (Royal Food Import Corp) v. 烟台洛克西进出口有限公司 Case number (2017)鲁06民初382号 Applicable NYC Provisions IV | IV(1) | IV(1)(a) | IV(1)(b) | V | V(1) | V(1)(b) | V(1)(c) Source http://wenshu.court.gov.cn (China Judgements Online)
Languages Chinese Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6550&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country China Court China, 浙江省宁波市中级人民法院 (Zhejiang, Ningbo Intermediate People’s Court) Date 02 March 2020 Parties UNID国际商社 (UNID Global Corporation) v. 宁波保税区长荣国际贸易有限公司 Case number (2019)浙02协外认4号 Applicable NYC Provisions IV | V | V(1) Source http://wenshu.court.gov.cn (China Judgements Online)
Languages Chinese Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6549&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country United States Court United States, U.S. District Court, District of Maryland Date 21 February 2020 Parties Estate of Ke Zhengguang v. Yu Naifen Stephany Case number 18-3546-PWG Applicable NYC Provisions III | IV | V | V(1) | V(2) | V(2)(b) | VI Source online: PACER
Languages English Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5713&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country China Court China, 厦门海事法院 (Xiamen Maritime Court) Date 18 February 2020 Parties 招商银行股份有限公司厦门分行 v. MK离岸私人有限公司 (MK Offshore Pte Ltd) Case number (2019)闽72民特1042号 Applicable NYC Provisions IV | V | V(1) | V(2) Source http://wenshu.court.gov.cn (China Judgements Online)
Languages Chinese Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6548&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country China Court China, 上海市第一中级人民法院 (Shanghai No. 1 Intermediate People’s Court) Date 17 February 2020 Parties 上海诺基亚贝尔股份有限公司 v. 乌兹特拉斯加斯股份有限公司 (Joint Stock Company Uztransgaz) Case number (2018)沪01协外认4号 Applicable NYC Provisions I | IV | V | V(1) | V(2) Source http://wenshu.court.gov.cn (China Judgements Online)
Languages Chinese Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6547&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country India Court India, Supreme Court Date 13 February 2020 Parties Vijay Karia & Ors. v. Prysmian Cavi e Sistemi S.r.l. & Ors. Case number Civil Appeals No. 1544 of 2020 and No. 1545 of 2020 Applicable NYC Provisions I | II | III | IV | V | V(1) | V(1)(a) | V(1)(b) | V(1)(e) | V(2) | V(2)(b) | VII | VII(1) Source https://www.sci.gov.in (website of the Supreme Court of India)
Languages English Summary Summary prepared by Ishita Mishra (Advocate, Supreme Court of India | Chambers of Mr. Gourab Banerji)
A sole arbitrator had passed four arbitral awards (Awards) in a London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) arbitration. The context of the dispute was a joint venture dispute between the Appellants and the Respondents. The Respondents had initiated arbitration proceedings against the Appellants for materially breaching various provisions of the joint venture agreement (JVA) and in particular, for loss of effective control over ‘Ravin’, the joint venture company. In response to these allegations, the Appellants filed a set of counter claims which alleged that the Respondents had violated their non-compete obligations by acquiring a competing business in India through their indirect acquisition of ACPL (which was Ravin’s competitor), breached confidentiality and interfered in the management of Ravin among others. The parties agreed that on account of the alleged material breaches, the party successful in this arbitration would be entitled to buy out the other at a 10% premium / discount under the JVA.
Through the first partial final award, the tribunal had interpreted certain provisions of the JVA and concluded that the Appellants had not succeeded in their primary submission that the conclusion of contracts of sales in India by the Respondent through a company other than Ravin was contrary to the JVA. In the second award, the tribunal dismissed the Appellant’s counter claims and observed that the Appellants had committed several breaches of the JVA. Counter claims of interference in management and mismanagement, breach of confidentiality and violation of non-compete obligations under the JVA were dismissed. The tribunal observed that the Appellant was always aware of Prysmian SA’s acquisition of the Draka group which would result in its acquisition of its subsidiary ACPL and yet had never objected to the same.
Prior to the passing of the third partial award, the Appellants challenged the appointment of the arbitrator on the ground of alleged lack of impartiality or independence. This challenge was dismissed by the LCIA Court as it had been made out of time as per the LCIA Rules. Through the final award, the shares to be transferred by the Appellants to the Respondents were valued. No challenge was made by the Appellants to this award under the (English) Arbitration Act, 1996 in the seat court (Courts of London, United Kingdom). An appeal was only filed by Shri Vijay Karia when an enforcement petition was filed under Section 48 of the Indian Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (1996 Act) at the Bombay High Court. Through his judgment, Justice A.K Menon held these 4 arbitral awards to be enforceable. The Bombay High Court enforced the arbitral awards as it found that none of the allegations raised by the Appellants met the conditions under Section 48 for a successful challenge such as that of an invalid arbitration agreement, violation of principles of natural justice, award going beyond the scope of arbitration, non-arbitrable subject matter and violation of the fundamental policy of India among others. The Appellants, unhappy with the Bombay High Court’s determination, impugned this judgment before the Supreme Court of India.
The Supreme Court when deciding on this appeal, first examined the scope of Section 48 of the 1996 Act. By citing precedent from the US Court of Appeals, Second Circuit in Parsons & Whittemore Overseas Co. v. Societe Generale De L’Industrie Du Papier 508 F.2d 969 (1974) and US District Court, District of Colombia in Compagnie des Bauxites de Guinee v. Hammermills Inc. (1992) WL 122712, US Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit in Karaha Codas Co., L.L.C v. Perusahaan Pertambagan Minyak 364 F.3d 274 (2004) among others observed that there was prevalence of a “pro-enforcement bias” under the NYC which was adopted by India within its legislature through Section 48 of the 1996 Act.
The Supreme Court further elaborated on the narrow review powers available to a ‘court’ under Section 48 of the 1996 Act. The Court approvingly cited provisions from its judgments in Renusagar Power Plant Co Ltd v. General Electric (1994 Supp (1) SCC 644) and Ssangyong Engineering & Construction Limited v. NHAI (2019 SCC OnLine SC 677) which observed that a foreign award being enforced under the NYC may not be examined by a review court on the basis of merits. The Court also referred to its judgment in Shri Lal Mahal v. Progetto Grando SPA (2014 2 SCC 433) and reiterated that Section 48(2)(b) of the 1996 Act contemplated a narrower review under the ground of “fundamental policy of Indian law”. The Court signaled towards the same being a part of the legislative intent by noting that Section 48 had been amended in 2015 to delete the ground of “contrary to the interest of India.”
The Supreme Court then considered the issue of whether a court could still enforce a foreign award even if some grounds under Section 48 of the 1996 Act were made out. This argument relied on the usage of the word “may” in Section 48 of the 1996 Act instead of ‘shall.’ The Court first discussed the legislative intent behind use of the word “may” in Article V NYC by endorsing the view that Articles V(1) and V(2) use permissive and not mandatory language. The Court then noted that the grounds under Section 48 could be classified into three groups i.e. “…grounds which affect the jurisdiction of the arbitration proceedings, grounds which affect the party interest alone; and grounds which go to the public policy of India…” and held that courts could not have any discretion if grounds affecting the public policy of India were made, but if grounds affecting party interest alone were made out, then the enforcing court will have the residual discretion when it came to enforcement of such awards. Consequently, the Supreme Court held that the word “may” in Section 48 of the 1996 Act could be interpreted as ‘shall’ depending on the context.
The Supreme Court also reviewed the Appellants’ challenge to the awards on the basis of violation of the principles of natural justice under Section 48(1)(b) of the 1996 Act. The Appellants’ had alleged that the principle of audi alteram partem was not followed as the Appellants had been unable to present their case on account of wilful failure on part of the Respondents to produce documents and the tribunal having not drawn a negative inference from the same. While deciding on this aspect, the Court referred to its judgment in Sohan Lal Gupta v. Asha Devi Gupta (2003 7 SCC 492) and the Delhi High Court’s judgment in Glencore International AG v. Dalmia Cement (Bharat) Limited (2017 SCC Online Del 8932). In Glencore International (supra), the Delhi High Court had observed that Section 48(1)(b) of the 1996 Act was pari materia to Article V(1)(b) NYC and hence a clear case of falling foul of the minimal standards of due process / natural justice needed to be established under Section 48(1)(b) of the 1996 Act to warrant a refusal of enforcement. The Supreme Court held that the phrase “was otherwise unable to present his case” should be interpreted narrowly and would be breached only if a fair hearing was not given by the tribunal to the parties. Poor reasoning by a tribunal would not meet the threshold under Section 48(1)(b) of the 1996 Act. The Court held that a failure of a tribunal in examining a material issue would not be sufficient for a challenge under Section 48(1)(b) of the 1996 Act unless such a failure went to the root of the matter and shocked the conscience of a court. The Court reiterated that a pro-enforcement undercurrent must feature in a review even under Section 48(1)(b) of the 1996 Act and that if an award addresses basic issues raised by the parties and in substance, decides on the claims and counter claims, then “enforcement must follow”.
The final issue before the Supreme Court was whether these awards violated India’s foreign exchange laws, and in particular, the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (FEMA). The award directed a sale of shares at a discount to a foreign party (the Respondents). The Supreme Court held that the award did not violate India’s public policy. The Court traced the history of India’s foreign exchange laws from ‘policing to management’ and approved the Delhi High Court’s judgment in Cruz City 1 Mauritius Holdings v. Unitech Limited (2017 239 DLT 649; in this case, the Delhi High Court had held that an application to resist enforcement of a foreign award on the basis of public policy grounds will only succeed if the objections are of such a nature that they offend the core values of India’s national policy “which it cannot be expected to compromise”, and that a mere inconsistency with a regulation like the FEMA, did not automatically meet this test). The Court noted that Section 47 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 (FERA) which held transactions that violated the FERA as void did not find place within the FEMA and held that a rectifiable breach under the FEMA could not amount to a violation of the fundamental policy of Indian law.
After noting the legislative and judicial history of Section 48 of the 1996 Act, the Supreme Court observed that the pleas taken by the Appellants forayed into a review of the awards on the basis of merits, and that the same is not permitted under Section 48 of the 1996 Act read with the NYC. The Supreme Court noted that the Appellants in the present case appeared to be indulging in “…speculative litigation with the fond hope that by flinging mud on a foreign arbitral award, some of the mud so flung would stick.”. The Supreme Court after perusing the court records, rejected all of the grounds raised, dismissed the appeal of Shri Vijay Karia and imposed costs on the Appellants of Rs. 5,000,000 (Indian Rupees Five Million) for attempting to argue this matter as a first appeal despite being aware of the limited scope of review available under Section 48 of the 1996 Act.
affirms : Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5809&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country China Court China, 海口海事法院 (Haikou Maritime Court) Date 30 December 2019 Parties 特莱顿国际集装箱有限公司 (Triton Container International Limited) v. 洋浦经济开发区建设投资开发有限公司 Case number (2015)琼海法他字第1号 Applicable NYC Provisions IV | V | V(1) | V(1)(a) | V(1)(b) | V(1)(c) | V(1)(d) Source http://wenshu.court.gov.cn (China Judgements Online)
Languages Chinese Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6545&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country China Court China, 浙江省宁波市中级人民法院 (Zhejiang, Ningbo Intermediate People’s Court) Date 26 December 2019 Parties 鲁彼昂姆公司 (Lubiam Moda Per L’uomo S.P.A.) v. 宁波杉杉时尚服装品牌管理有限公司 Case number (2019)浙02协外认5号 Applicable NYC Provisions IV | V | V(1) | V(1)(c) | V(2) | V(2)(b) Source http://wenshu.court.gov.cn (China Judgements Online)
Languages Chinese Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6544&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country China Court China, 山东省日照市中级人民法院 (Shandong, Rizhao Intermediate People’s Court) Date 25 December 2019 Parties 大宝产业株式会社 v. 山东浩瀚能源有限公司 Case number (2018)鲁11协外认3号 Applicable NYC Provisions III | IV | V | V(1) | V(1)(b) | V(1)(c) | V(1)(d) Source http://wenshu.court.gov.cn (China Judgements Online)
Languages Chinese Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6543&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Morocco Court Morocco, Commercial Court of Appeal of Casablanca Date 23 December 2019 Parties Talem Food Beverages v. Copragri, StockPralim, Consorts Boutegray, and Zeina El Kabir Case number 5539/8101/2019 Applicable NYC Provisions III | IV Source Registry of the court
Languages Arabic Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6624&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country China Court China, 上海市第一中级人民法院 (Shanghai No. 1 Intermediate People’s Court) Date 17 December 2019 Parties ACME清洁技术解决方案私人有限公司 (ACME Cleantech Solutions Private Limited) v. 中电电气（上海）太阳能科技有限公司 Case number (2019) 沪01协外认12号 Applicable NYC Provisions I | III | IV | V Source http://wenshu.court.gov.cn (China Judgements Online)
Languages Chinese Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6542&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Morocco Court Morocco, Commercial Court of Appeal of Casablanca Date 17 December 2019 Parties Agricultural Company for the Commercialization and Packaging Copragri v. Adam International Company Case number 1585/8225/2019 Applicable NYC Provisions IV | V | V(1) | V(1)(b) | V(1)(d) Source Registry of the court
Languages Arabic Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6627&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country China Court China, 辽宁省大连市中级人民法院 (Liaoning, Dalian Intermediate People’s Court) Date 03 December 2019 Parties 南太平洋风险投资有限公司 (South Pacific Ventures FZE) v. 盘锦辽河油田凯特石油设备有限公司 Case number (2019)辽02协外认8号 Applicable NYC Provisions IV | V | V(1) | V(2) | V(2)(a) | V(2)(b) Source http://wenshu.court.gov.cn (China Judgements Online)
Languages Chinese Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6541&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country China Court China, 辽宁省抚顺市中级人民法院 (Liaoning, Fushun Intermediate People’s Court) Date 12 November 2019 Parties (株)KSP(KSP Co., Ltd.) v. 抚顺中兴重工有限公司 Case number (2019)辽04外协认13号 Applicable NYC Provisions IV | V | V(1) | V(1)(b) Source http://wenshu.court.gov.cn (China Judgements Online)
Languages Chinese Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6539&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country United States Court United States, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York Date 08 November 2019 Parties Professional Sport Service Fi Oy v. Puck Agency LLC Case number 19-CV-5904 (CS) Applicable NYC Provisions IV | IV(1) | V | V(1) Source online: PACER
Languages English Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5696&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Cyprus Court Cyprus, Επαρχιακό Δικαστήριο Λευκωσίας (District Court of Nicosia) Date 08 October 2019 Parties Γιεροσιέβσκι (Yerosievski) v. Phoenix Pharmacy Limited Case number Application No. 479/18 Applicable NYC Provisions IV Source http://www.cylaw.org (CyLaw website)
Languages Greek, Modern (1453-) Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6696&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Cyprus Court Cyprus, Επαρχιακό Δικαστήριο Λεμεσού (District Court of Limassol) Date 04 October 2019 Parties Ομοσπονδιακή Κρατική Ενιαία Εταιρία “Πανρωσική Τηλεοπτική Ραδιοφωνική Εταιρία” (Federal State Unitary Enterprise “Pan-Russian Television and Radio Company”) v. Trevano Pictures Limited Case number Foreign General Application No. 2/19 Applicable NYC Provisions II | II(2) | IV | IV(1) | IV(1)(a) | IV(1)(b) | IV(2) | V | V(1) | V(1)(a) | V(1)(b) | V(1)(c) | V(1)(e) | V(2) | V(2)(a) | V(2)(b) Source http://www.cylaw.org (CyLaw website)
Languages Greek, Modern (1453-) Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6654&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Lithuania Court Lithuania, Lietuvos Apeliacinis Teismas (Court of Appeal of Lithuania) Date 03 October 2019 Parties „Redwater“ N.V. v. JSC Murmansk Shipping Company Case number e2T-75-464/2019 Applicable NYC Provisions II | IV | IV(1) | V | V(2) | V(2)(a) | V(2)(b) Source https://www.apeliacinis.lt (website of the Court of Appeal of Lithuania)
Languages Lithuanian Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6004&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country United States Court United States, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California Date 24 September 2019 Parties Waleed Al-Qarqani, et al. v. Chevron Corporation and Chevron U.S.A., Inc. Case number C 18-03297 JSW Applicable NYC Provisions II | II(1) | II(2) | IV | IV(1) | IV(2) | V | V(1) | V(1)(d) | V(2) Source online: PACER
Languages English Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5691&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Spain Court Spain, Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Cataluña (High Court of Justice of Catalonia) Date 19 September 2019 Parties Edemiro v. Erasmo Case number ATSJ CAT 570/2019 Applicable NYC Provisions II | IV | V | V(2) Source Consejo General del Poder Judicial (Centro de Documentación Judicial – CENDOJ)
Languages Spanish Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5762&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Netherlands Court Netherlands, Gerechtshof Den Haag (Court of Appeal of The Hague) Date 10 September 2019 Parties Leidos Incorporated v. Helleense Republiek (Griekenland) Case number 200.248.376/01 Applicable NYC Provisions III | IV | IV(2) | V | V(1) | V(1)(e) | V(2) | V(2)(b) | VI Source https://www.rechtspraak.nl (official website of the Netherlands judiciary system)
Languages Dutch Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5631&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Lithuania Court Lithuania, Lietuvos Apeliacinis Teismas (Court of Appeal of Lithuania) Date 05 September 2019 Parties Privati unitarinė transporto bendrovė „VseAll“ v. UAB „Audasta“ Case number 2T-61-370/2019 Applicable NYC Provisions II | IV | IV(1) | V | V(2) | V(2)(a) | V(2)(b) Source https://www.apeliacinis.lt (website of the Court of Appeal of Lithuania)
Languages Lithuanian Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6001&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Switzerland Court Switzerland, Camera di esecuzione e fallimenti del Tribunale d’appello, Repubblica e Cantone Ticino Date 16 August 2019 Case number 14.2019.132 Applicable NYC Provisions II | II(2) | IV | IV(1) Source http://www.sentenze.ti.ch/ (website of the Canton of Ticino), published with the authorization of the competent authorities
Languages Italian Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5661&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country United Kingdom Court England and Wales, High Court Date 31 July 2019 Parties European Film Bonds A/S and others v. Lotus Holdings LLC and others Case number BL-2018-002267 Applicable NYC Provisions II | IV | IV(1) | V | V(1) | V(1)(a) Source [2019] EWHC 2116 (Ch) | online: BAILII
Languages English Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5524&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Ukraine Court Ukraine, Київський апеляційний суд (Kyiv Court of Appeal) Date 17 July 2019 Parties PJSC State Savings Bank of Ukraine v. Russian Federation (Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation) Case number 824/66/19 Applicable NYC Provisions II | IV | V Source http://reyestr.court.gov.ua (website of the Unified State Register of Court Decisions)
Languages Ukrainian Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5800&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Netherlands Court Netherlands, Gerechtshof Den Haag (Court of Appeal of The Hague) Date 16 July 2019 Parties Vantage Deepwater Company and Vantage Deepwater Drilling Inc. v. Petrobras America Inc., Petrobras Venezuela Investments & Services B.V. and Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. Case number 200.249.688/01 Applicable NYC Provisions III | IV | IV(1) | IV(2) | V | V(1) | V(1)(e) | VI Source https://www.rechtspraak.nl (official website of the Netherlands judiciary system)
Languages Dutch Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5509&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Uzbekistan Court Uzbekistan, Экономический суд города Ташкента (Tashkent Commercial Court) Date 12 July 2019 Case number 4-11-1904/215 Applicable NYC Provisions III | IV | IV(1) | V | V(1) Source https://public.sud.uz (website of the Supreme Court of Uzbekistan)
Languages Uzbek Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5902&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Ukraine Court Ukraine, Київський апеляційний суд (Kyiv Court of Appeal) Date 26 June 2019 Parties SERGOIL LLC v. PrJSC Nizhynskyi Zhyrokombinat Case number 824/71/19 Applicable NYC Provisions IV Source http://reyestr.court.gov.ua (website of the Unified State Register of Court Decisions)
Languages Ukrainian Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5790&opac_view=6
Country Ukraine Court Ukraine, Київський апеляційний суд (Kyiv Court of Appeal) Date 26 June 2019 Parties SERGOIL LLC v. PrJSC Nizhynskyi Zhyrokombinat Case number 824/71/19 Applicable NYC Provisions IV Source http://reyestr.court.gov.ua (website of the Unified State Register of Court Decisions)
Languages Ukrainian Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5791&opac_view=6
Country Ukraine Court Ukraine, Київський апеляційний суд (Kyiv Court of Appeal) Date 26 June 2019 Parties SERGOIL LLC v. PrJSC Nizhynskyi Zhyrokombinat Case number 824/71/19 Applicable NYC Provisions IV Source http://reyestr.court.gov.ua (website of the Unified State Register of Court Decisions)
Languages Ukrainian Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5788&opac_view=6
Country Ukraine Court Ukraine, Київський апеляційний суд (Kyiv Court of Appeal) Date 26 June 2019 Parties SERGOIL LLC v. PrJSC Nizhynskyi Zhyrokombinat Case number 824/71/19 Applicable NYC Provisions IV Source http://reyestr.court.gov.ua (website of the Unified State Register of Court Decisions)
Languages Ukrainian Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5792&opac_view=6
Country Ukraine Court Ukraine, Київський апеляційний суд (Kyiv Court of Appeal) Date 26 June 2019 Parties SERGOIL LLC v. PrJSC Nizhynskyi Zhyrokombinat Case number 824/71/19 Applicable NYC Provisions IV Source http://reyestr.court.gov.ua (website of the Unified State Register of Court Decisions)
Languages Ukrainian Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5789&opac_view=6
Country Ukraine Court Ukraine, Київський апеляційний суд (Kyiv Court of Appeal) Date 26 June 2019 Parties SERGOIL LLC v. PrJSC Nizhynskyi Zhyrokombinat Case number 824/71/19 Applicable NYC Provisions IV Source http://reyestr.court.gov.ua (website of the Unified State Register of Court Decisions)
Languages Ukrainian Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5793&opac_view=6
Country Ukraine Court Ukraine, Київський апеляційний суд (Kyiv Court of Appeal) Date 26 June 2019 Parties SERGOIL LLC v. PrJSC Nizhynskyi Zhyrokombinat Case number 824/71/19 Applicable NYC Provisions IV Source http://reyestr.court.gov.ua (website of the Unified State Register of Court Decisions)
Languages Ukrainian Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5794&opac_view=6
Country Ukraine Court Ukraine, Київський апеляційний суд (Kyiv Court of Appeal) Date 26 June 2019 Parties SERGOIL LLC v. PrJSC Nizhynskyi Zhyrokombinat Case number 824/71/19 Applicable NYC Provisions IV Source http://reyestr.court.gov.ua (website of the Unified State Register of Court Decisions)
Languages Ukrainian see also : Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5795&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Uzbekistan Court Uzbekistan, Экономический суд города Ташкента (Tashkent Commercial Court) Date 07 June 2019 Case number 4-10-1909/78 Applicable NYC Provisions III | IV | IV(1) | V | V(1) Source https://public.sud.uz (website of the Supreme Court of Uzbekistan)
Languages Uzbek Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5909&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Ukraine Court Ukraine, Київський апеляційний суд (Kyiv Court of Appeal) Date 03 June 2019 Parties Glass Container Prim S.A. v. PrJSC Halitsiia Dystyleri Case number 824/2/19 Applicable NYC Provisions III | IV Source http://reyestr.court.gov.ua (website of the Unified State Register of Court Decisions)
Languages Ukrainian Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5785&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Ukraine Court Ukraine, Київський апеляційний суд (Kyiv Court of Appeal) Date 03 June 2019 Parties RHI GLAS GmbH v. Piskivskyi Zavod Sklovyrobiv LLC, PJSC Insuranse Company “Kraina” Case number 824/265/18 Applicable NYC Provisions III | IV | V Source http://reyestr.court.gov.ua (website of the Unified State Register of Court Decisions)
Languages Ukrainian Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5786&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Ukraine Court Ukraine, Київський апеляційний суд (Kyiv Court of Appeal) Date 27 May 2019 Parties GBI&CLC OU v. SE “Zavod Poroshkovoi Metalurhii” Case number 824/252/2018 Applicable NYC Provisions IV | V Source http://reyestr.court.gov.ua (website of the Unified State Register of Court Decisions)
Languages Ukrainian Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5781&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Uzbekistan Court Uzbekistan, Экономический суд Андижанской области (Commercial Court of the Andijon Region) Date 22 May 2019 Case number 4-17-1909/4 Applicable NYC Provisions III | IV | V Source https://public.sud.uz (website of the Supreme Court of Uzbekistan)
Languages Uzbek Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5910&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Ukraine Court Ukraine, Херсонський апеляційний суд (Court of Appeal of Kherson) Date 21 May 2019 Parties ICE COM Handelges.m.b.H. v. PP “Barbet” Case number 766/19814/17 Applicable NYC Provisions IV | V Source http://reyestr.court.gov.ua (website of the Unified State Register of Court Decisions)
Languages Ukrainian reverses : Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5780&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Uzbekistan Court Uzbekistan, Экономический суд города Ташкента (Tashkent Commercial Court) Date 17 May 2019 Parties Fatexpro AG v. OOO «KOMBIKORM PRODUKT SOYUZ» Case number 4-10-1918/102 Applicable NYC Provisions III | IV | IV(1) | V | V(1) Source https://public.sud.uz (website of the Supreme Court of Uzbekistan)
Languages Uzbek Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5911&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country China Court China, 武汉海事法院 (Wuhan Maritime Court) Date 15 May 2019 Parties VM有限公司 (Valentine Maritime Ltd.) v. 江苏中汇进出口有限公司 & 南京天舜船舶有限公司 Case number (2018)鄂72协外认1号之一 Applicable NYC Provisions III | IV | V | V(1) | V(1)(b) | V(2) Source http://wenshu.court.gov.cn (China Judgements Online)
Languages Chinese Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6532&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Ukraine Court Ukraine, Київський апеляційний суд (Kyiv Court of Appeal) Date 14 May 2019 Parties MetMash Ufalei LLC v. Donbastekhnolohiia LLC Case number 263/12128/18 Applicable NYC Provisions IV | V Source http://reyestr.court.gov.ua (website of the Unified State Register of Court Decisions)
Languages Ukrainian Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5779&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Ukraine Court Ukraine, Верховний Суд (Supreme Court) Date 08 May 2019 Parties JSC RN-Trans v. ITEK-TRANS LLC Case number 761/39565/17 Applicable NYC Provisions III | IV Source http://reyestr.court.gov.ua (website of the Unified State Register of Court Decisions)
Languages Ukrainian affirms : Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5778&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Spain Court Spain, Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Madrid (High Court of Justice of Madrid) Date 30 April 2019 Parties TP Ferro Concesionaria S.A. v. Reino de España Case number ATSJ M 452/2019 Applicable NYC Provisions IV | V Source Consejo General del Poder Judicial (Centro de Documentación Judicial – CENDOJ)
Languages Spanish Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5757&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Ukraine Court Ukraine, Верховний Суд (Supreme Court) Date 17 April 2019 Parties Moston Properties Limited v. PJSC “Ukrgasvydobuvannia” Case number 761/41709/17 Applicable NYC Provisions IV | IV(2) | V | V(2) | V(2)(a) | V(2)(b) Source http://reyestr.court.gov.ua (website of the Unified State Register of Court Decisions)
Languages Ukrainian affirms : see also : Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5776&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Lithuania Court Lithuania, Lietuvos Apeliacinis Teismas (Court of Appeal of Lithuania) Date 16 April 2019 Parties Privačioji akcinė bendrovė Charkovo staklių gamykla v. UAB „Žaibas“ Case number e2T-46-381/2019 Applicable NYC Provisions III | IV | IV(1) | V | V(1) | V(2) Source https://www.apeliacinis.lt (website of the Court of Appeal of Lithuania)
Languages Lithuanian Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5999&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Ukraine Court Ukraine, Київський апеляційний суд (Kyiv Court of Appeal) Date 16 April 2019 Parties China National Complete Engineering Corporation v. PJSC State Food and Grain Corporation of Ukraine Case number 824/256/2018 Applicable NYC Provisions IV | V Source http://reyestr.court.gov.ua (website of the Unified State Register of Court Decisions)
Languages Ukrainian Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5775&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Uzbekistan Court Uzbekistan, Экономический суд города Ташкента (Tashkent Commercial Court) Date 16 April 2019 Parties Kazakhstan Electricity Grid Operating Company (AO «KEGOC») v. АО «Узбекэнерго» Case number 4-10-1918/58 Applicable NYC Provisions III | IV | IV(1) | V | V(1) Source https://public.sud.uz (website of the Supreme Court of Uzbekistan)
Languages Uzbek Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5912&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Spain Court Spain, Tribunal Superior de Justicia de la Región de Murcia (High Court of Justice of the Region of Murcia) Date 12 April 2019 Parties Productos Florida S.A. v. Amc Juices S.L. Case number ATSJ MU 12/2019 Applicable NYC Provisions IV | V | V(1) | V(1)(e) | V(2) | V(2)(b) | VI Source Consejo General del Poder Judicial (Centro de Documentación Judicial – CENDOJ)
Languages Spanish Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5756&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country China Court China, 河南省郑州市中级人民法院 (Henan, Zhengzhou Intermediate People’s Court) Date 27 March 2019 Parties 昌盛贸易公司 (Chang Sheng Trading Co. Inc) v. 河南江河机械有限责任公司 Case number (2017)豫01协外认11号 Applicable NYC Provisions I | III | IV | V Source http://wenshu.court.gov.cn (China Judgements Online)
Languages Chinese Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6530&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Ukraine Court Ukraine, Херсонський міський суд Херсонської області (Khersonskyi City Court of Kherson Region) Date 27 March 2019 Parties ILTA Agribusiness DMCC v. Grein-Bord LLC Case number 766/20098/17 Applicable NYC Provisions II | IV Source http://reyestr.court.gov.ua (website of the Unified State Register of Court Decisions)
Languages Ukrainian Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5770&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Ukraine Court Ukraine, Київський апеляційний суд (Kyiv Court of Appeal) Date 26 March 2019 Parties J.S. Corrugating Machinery Co., Ltd v. Yug Karton LLC Case number 824/4/19 Applicable NYC Provisions IV | V Source http://reyestr.court.gov.ua (website of the Unified State Register of Court Decisions)
Languages Ukrainian Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5769&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Lithuania Court Lithuania, Lietuvos Apeliacinis Teismas (Court of Appeal of Lithuania) Date 19 March 2019 Parties AB „Eurasian foods“ v. UAB „Miros grupė“ Case number e2T-36-381/2019 Applicable NYC Provisions III | IV | IV(1) | V | V(1) | V(2) Source https://www.apeliacinis.lt (website of the Court of Appeal of Lithuania)
Languages Lithuanian Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5998&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Netherlands Court Netherlands, Gerechtshof Den Haag (Court of Appeal of The Hague) Date 19 March 2019 Parties Eco Recovery Solutions v. Fondel Holding B.V. Case number 200.246.547/01 Applicable NYC Provisions III | IV | IV(1) | IV(1)(a) | IV(1)(b) | V | V(1) | V(1)(d) | V(2) | V(2)(b) Source https://www.rechtspraak.nl (official website of the Netherlands judiciary system)
Languages Dutch Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5938&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country China Court China, 上海市第一中级人民法院 (Shanghai No. 1 Intermediate People’s Court) Date 12 March 2019 Parties 信息管理服务全球有限公司 v. 新疆美克化工股份有限公司 Case number (2018)沪01协外认23号 Applicable NYC Provisions I | IV | V | V(1) | V(1)(a) Source http://wenshu.court.gov.cn (China Judgements Online)
Languages Chinese Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6529&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Canada Court Canada, Ontario Superior Court of Justice Date 08 March 2019 Parties Tianjin Huarong Equity Investment Fund Partnership (Limited Partnership) and Shanghai Liyi Equity Investment Center (Limited Partnership) v. Shuqin Xu Case number CV-18-00602425-00CL Applicable NYC Provisions I | IV | V | V(1) | V(1)(b) Source 2019 ONSC 628 | online: CanLII
Languages English Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5501&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Ukraine Court Ukraine, Київський апеляційний суд (Kyiv Court of Appeal) Date 06 March 2019 Parties Przedsiebiorstwo Uslugowe “Poz-Pliszka” Spolka z Ograniczona Odpowiedzialnoscia v. Pozhmashkomplekt LLC Case number 760/2768/18 Applicable NYC Provisions IV | V Source http://reyestr.court.gov.ua (website of the Unified State Register of Court Decisions)
Languages Ukrainian Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5767&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Ukraine Court Ukraine, Київський апеляційний суд (Kyiv Court of Appeal) Date 01 March 2019 Parties Fishing Company S.A. v. State Enterprise “Servis” Case number 824/266/18 Applicable NYC Provisions II | IV Source http://reyestr.court.gov.ua (website of the Unified State Register of Court Decisions)
Languages Ukrainian Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5766&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country United States Court United States, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York Date 12 February 2019 Parties State Enterprise Research-Industrial Complex “Pavlograd Chemical Plant” v. Petroleum & Materials LLC Case number CV 18-2510 (ADS) (AKT) Applicable NYC Provisions I | IV | IV(1) | V | V(1) Source online: PACER
Languages English Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5531&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country China Court China, 山东省青岛市中级人民法院 (Shandong, Qingdao Intermediate People’s Court) Date 31 January 2019 Parties 别尔基私人股份有限公司 v. 青岛金润琪橡胶机械有限公司 Case number (2019)鲁02协外认4号 Applicable NYC Provisions III | IV | V Source http://wenshu.court.gov.cn (China Judgements Online)
Languages Chinese Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6527&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Ukraine Court Ukraine, Київський апеляційний суд (Kyiv Court of Appeal) Date 31 January 2019 Parties Stark Power GmbH v. PJSC Azot Case number 824/238/2018 Applicable NYC Provisions IV | V Source http://reyestr.court.gov.ua (website of the Unified State Register of Court Decisions)
Languages Ukrainian Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6166&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Cyprus Court Cyprus, Επαρχιακό Δικαστήριο Λεμεσού (District Court of Limassol) Date 30 January 2019 Parties Suek AG v. Larcher Trading Limited Case number Foreign Decision No. 5/2018 Applicable NYC Provisions IV | IV(1) | IV(2) | V | V(1) | V(1)(b) | V(1)(e) | V(2) | V(2)(b) Source http://www.cylaw.org (CyLaw website)
Languages Greek, Modern (1453-) Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6710&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Uzbekistan Court Uzbekistan, Экономический суд города Ташкента (Tashkent Commercial Court) Date 23 January 2019 Parties Kazakhstan Electricity Grid Operating Company (AO «KEGOC») v. АО «Узбекэнерго» Case number 4-10-1818/237 Applicable NYC Provisions III | IV | IV(1) | V | V(1) Source https://public.sud.uz (website of the Supreme Court of Uzbekistan)
Languages Uzbek Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5913&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country China Court China, 山东省日照市中级人民法院 (Shandong, Rizhao Intermediate People’s Court) Date 15 January 2019 Parties 肯考迪亚农产品贸易有限公司 (Concordia Agritrading Pte Ltd) v. 山东晨曦集团有限公司, 山东晨曦集团有限公司管理人 Case number (2018)鲁11协外认4号 Applicable NYC Provisions III | IV | V Source http://wenshu.court.gov.cn (China Judgements Online)
Languages Chinese Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6523&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country China Court China, 山东省日照市中级人民法院 (Shandong, Rizhao Intermediate People’s Court) Date 15 January 2019 Parties 肯考迪亚农产品贸易有限公司 (Concordia Agritrading Pte Ltd) v. 山东晨曦集团有限公司, 山东晨曦集团有限公司管理人 Case number (2018)鲁11协外认5号 Applicable NYC Provisions III | IV | V Source http://wenshu.court.gov.cn (China Judgements Online)
Languages Chinese Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6524&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Albania Court Albania, Gjykata e Apelit Tirane (Court of Appeal of Tirana) Date 10 January 2019 Parties Galenika A.D. v. Jona Farma Sh.p.k Applicable NYC Provisions IV | IV(2) | V | V(1) | V(2) Source http://www.gjykata.gov.al (website of the Courts of the Republic of Albania)
Languages Albanian Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5730&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Ukraine Court Ukraine, Київський апеляційний суд (Kyiv Court of Appeal) Date 10 January 2019 Parties Sparebank 1 Nord-Nordge v. Saint-Petersburg Commercial Bank Tavricheskyi Case number 796/191/2018 Applicable NYC Provisions IV | V Source http://reyestr.court.gov.ua (website of the Unified State Register of Court Decisions)
Languages Ukrainian Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6165&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Lithuania Court Lithuania, Lietuvos Apeliacinis Teismas (Court of Appeal of Lithuania) Date 09 January 2019 Parties UAB „LATAKKO“ v. UAB „Auto moto NG“ Case number e2T-9-823/2019 Applicable NYC Provisions III | IV | IV(1) | V | V(1) | V(1)(b) | V(2) | V(2)(a) | V(2)(b) Source https://www.apeliacinis.lt (website of the Court of Appeal of Lithuania)
Languages Lithuanian Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5996&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Ukraine Court Ukraine, Київський апеляційний суд (Kyiv Court of Appeal) Date 28 December 2018 Parties Grifon Trade S.r.o. v. SE Zavod Poroshkovoyi Metalurhiyi Case number 796/198/2018 Applicable NYC Provisions IV | V Source http://reyestr.court.gov.ua (website of the Unified State Register of Court Decisions)
Languages Ukrainian Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6164&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country China Court China, 河南省郑州市中级人民法院 (Henan, Zhengzhou Intermediate People’s Court) Date 27 December 2018 Parties 翱兰国际有限公司 (Olam International Limited) v. 郑州朝歌纺纱有限公司 Case number (2018)豫01协外认3号 Applicable NYC Provisions IV | V | V(1) | V(2) Source http://wenshu.court.gov.cn (China Judgements Online)
Languages Chinese
