Generic terms
sorted by (Publication date descending, Resource ascending) Add to selection
Quick view
Refine your search
Guide
Available documents (250)
sorted by (Publication date descending, Resource ascending) Add to selection
Quick view
Refine your search
Spain / 30 January 2014 / Spain, Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Cataluña (High Court of Justice of Catalonia) / Dir-Air Oy v. Systemair Products S.A. / ATSJ CAT 6/2014
Country Spain Court Spain, Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Cataluña (High Court of Justice of Catalonia) Date 30 January 2014 Parties Dir-Air Oy v. Systemair Products S.A. Case number ATSJ CAT 6/2014 Applicable NYC Provisions I | IV | IV(1) | IV(1)(a) | IV(1)(b) | V | V(1) | V(2) Source Consejo General del Poder Judicial (Centro de Documentación Judicial – CENDOJ)
Languages Spanish Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=3980&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Germany Court Germany, Oberlandesgericht Frankfurt am Main (Higher Regional Court of Frankfurt am Main) Date 16 January 2014 Parties N/A Case number 16/01/2014 Applicable NYC Provisions IV | IV(1) | IV(1)(b) | V | V(1) | V(1)(e) | V(2) | V(2)(b) Source Languages German Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=4125&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Cyprus Court Cyprus, Επαρχιακό Δικαστήριο Λευκωσίας (District Court of Nicosia) Date 18 December 2013 Parties Arsanovia Limited v. Cruz City 1 Mauritius Holdings Case number General Application No. 706/13 Applicable NYC Provisions I | II | III | IV | IV(1) | IV(1)(a) | IV(1)(b) | IV(2) | V Source http://www.cylaw.org (CyLaw website)
Languages Greek, Modern (1453-) see also : Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6656&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Colombia Court Colombia, Corte Suprema de Justicia (Supreme Court of Justice) Date 19 November 2013 Parties Poligráfica C.A. v. Columbia Tecnología Ltda. Case number 11001-0203-000-2008-00317-00 Applicable NYC Provisions IV | IV(1) | IV(1)(a) | IV(1)(b) | VII | VII(1) Source http://www.cortesuprema.gov.co (website of the Corte Suprema de Justicia)
Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=4406&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Spain Court Spain, Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Andalucía (High Court of Justice of Andalusia) Date 14 November 2013 Parties Stemat B.V. v. Underwater Contractors Spain S.L. Case number ATSJ AND 54/2013 Applicable NYC Provisions IV | IV(1) | IV(1)(b) | V | V(1) | V(1)(b) Source Consejo General del Poder Judicial (Centro de Documentación Judicial – CENDOJ)
Languages Spanish Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=3982&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Singapore Court Singapore, Court of Appeal Date 31 October 2013 Parties PT First Media TBK (formerly known as PT Broadband Multimedia TBK) v. Astro Nusantara International BV and others and another appeal Case number [2013] SGCA 57, Civil Appeals Nos 150 and 151 of 2012 Applicable NYC Provisions IV | IV(1) | IV(1)(b) | V | V(1) | V(1)(a) | V(1)(c) | V(1)(e) Source © 2017 Singapore Academy of Law. No part of this document may be reproduced without consent from the copyright holder.
Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=4164&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Korea Court Korea, Seoul High Court Date 16 August 2013 Parties A v. B, Inc. Case number 2012Na88930 Applicable NYC Provisions II | II(1) | III | IV | IV(1) | IV(1)(b) | V | V(1) | V(1)(a) | V(1)(c) Source Languages Korean Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6433&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Bulgaria Court Bulgaria, Софийски градски съд (Sofia City Court) Date 17 July 2013 Case number Commercial Case No. 8920/2012 Applicable NYC Provisions II | III | IV | IV(1) | IV(1)(a) | IV(2) | V | V(1) | V(1)(b) | V(2) Source https://legalacts.justice.bg (database of Bulgarian judicial acts)
Languages Bulgarian Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5192&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Russia Court Russia, Арбитражный суд Свердловской области (Arbitrazh Court of Sverdlovsk Oblast) Date 28 June 2013 Parties TOO Ak-Zhaiyik v. OOO Standart-Logistika Case number А60-14695/2013 Applicable NYC Provisions II | II(1) | II(2) | IV | IV(1) | V Source http://kad.arbitr.ru (register of decisions of the RF arbitrazh courts)
Languages Russian Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5454&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Canada Court Canada, Supreme Court of Nova Scotia Date 14 June 2013 Parties Rusk Renovations Inc. v. Robert Dunsworth, Ingrid Dunsworth, and Europa Stairways Inc. Case number Hfx No. 389841 Applicable NYC Provisions II | II(1) | III | IV | IV(1) | V | V(1) | V(1)(a) | V(1)(b) | V(1)(d) | V(1)(e) Source 2013 NSSC 179 | online: CanLII
Languages English Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5414&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Cyprus Court Cyprus, Επαρχιακό Δικαστήριο Πάφου (District Court of Paphos) Date 22 March 2013 Parties OOO Syntez v. Systcom Ltd Case number General Application No. 2/10 Applicable NYC Provisions IV | IV(1) | IV(1)(a) | IV(1)(b) | IV(2) | V Source http://www.cylaw.org (CyLaw website)
Languages Greek, Modern (1453-) Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6689&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Germany Court Germany, Oberlandesgericht Dresden (Higher Regional Court of Dresden) Date 07 March 2013 Parties N/A Case number 07/03/2013 Applicable NYC Provisions IV | IV(1) | IV(1)(a) Source Registry of the Court
Languages German Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=4127&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Morocco Court Morocco, المحكمة التجارية بالدار البيضاء (Commercial Court of Casablanca) Date 06 March 2013 Parties Enerciel Tunisie v. Gemtech and Said Kamra Case number 323 Applicable NYC Provisions III | IV | IV(1) | IV(1)(a) | IV(1)(b) | V | V(1) | V(1)(b) | V(1)(c) Source Registry of the Court
Languages Arabic affirmed by : Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=4508&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country India Court India, High Court of Bombay Date 04 February 2013 Parties Louis Dreyfus Commodities Asia Pte Ltd v. Govind Rubber Limited Case number Arbitration Petition No. 174 of 2012 Applicable NYC Provisions IV | IV(1) Source http://www.indiankanoon.org (website of decisions of the Supreme Court as well as several High Courts)
Languages English Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=3913&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Spain Court Spain, Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Cataluña (High Court of Justice of Catalonia) Date 29 November 2012 Parties SC Eco Construct S.L. v. Viure AMB Confort S.L. Case number ATSJ CAT 629/2012 Applicable NYC Provisions I | IV | IV(1) | IV(1)(a) | IV(1)(b) | V | V(1) | V(2) Source Consejo General del Poder Judicial (Centro de Documentación Judicial – CENDOJ)
Languages Spanish Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=3986&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Serbia Court Serbia, Privredni Apelacioni Sud (Commercial Court of Appeal) Date 28 November 2012 Case number 6 Pvz 970/12 Applicable NYC Provisions I | I(3) | IV | IV(1) | V | V(1) | V(2) Source Registry of Court
Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=3677&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Switzerland Court Switzerland, Tribunal fédéral (Federal Tribunal) Date 18 September 2012 Parties YX., ZX., VX. and WX. v. A. and BX. Case number 5A_344/2012 Applicable NYC Provisions IV | IV(1) Source http://www.bger.ch (website of Swiss Federal Tribunal)
Languages French Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6296&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Korea Court Korea, Seoul High Court Date 23 August 2012 Parties Dongjin Semichem Co., Ltd. v. Defendant Case number 2010Na88882 Applicable NYC Provisions II | II(1) | II(2) | IV | IV(1) | V | V(1) Source Languages Korean reversed by : Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6429&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Switzerland Court Switzerland, Bundesgericht Date 02 July 2012 Case number 5A_754/2011 Applicable NYC Provisions IV | IV(1) | IV(2) | V | V(2) | V(2)(b) | VII | VII(1) Source http://www.bger.ch (website of Swiss Federal Tribunal)
Languages English Summary The parties entered into an exclusive distribution and licensing agreement, which provided for arbitration under the Rules of the International Chamber of Commerce (“ICC”) by a sole arbitrator in London. A dispute arose and the licensor initiated arbitration proceedings. The sole arbitrator rendered an award prohibiting the licensee from further using certain trademarks belonging to the licensor, while at the same time ordering the licensor to make certain payments to the licensee, including payments for its arbitration costs. The licensee sought leave to enforce its award from the Bezirksgericht (Regional Court) Höfe, which essentially granted the request. The licensor appealed, unsuccessfully, to the Kantonsgericht Schyz (Cantonal Court) Schwyz, and subsequently to the Bundesgericht (Swiss Federal Tribunal). The licensor contented that the licensee’s submission of only a partial translation of the English arbitral award into German violated Article IV(2) NYC, which, it argued, mandatorily required the submission of a German translation of the full text of the arbitral award which was sought to be enforced, regardless of whether the court was capable of understanding the award in the English. It also argued that recognition and enforcement of the award would violate Swiss public policy under Article V(2)(b) NYC since the arbitral award ordered it to bear the full costs of the arbitration. The Bundesgericht dismissed the licensor’s appeal, upholding the decision granting leave to enforce the award. The Bundesgericht stated that there were differing views on the interpretation of Article IV(1) NYC both in academia and in court practice, and found that under Articles 31-33 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties the provision needed to be interpreted with a view to good faith, in conformity with its common meaning and in the light of its object and purpose. The Bundesgericht stated that the purpose of the NYC was to facilitate the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards, which required the enforcement-friendly interpretation of its norms. Moreover, the Bundesgericht found that Article IV(2) NYC served the function of enabling the enforcement court to evaluate possible grounds to refuse enforcement under Article V NYC based on a version of the arbitral award in a language that it could understand. The Bundesgericht further recalled that its prior case law indicated that form requirements under Article IV NYC were not to be applied restrictively. It concluded that it would be purely formalistic to require a full translation of the award in the present case, given that the licensee had provided a translation of the award’s dispositive section and of the section on costs that was disputed between the parties and which could have formed the basis of a possible defense under Article V NYC. In addition, the Bundesgericht found that Swiss courts nowadays normally do not depend on a translation in the case of English-language arbitral awards, so that the non-provision of a full translation did not endanger the purpose of Article IV(2) NYC. The Bundesgericht thus concluded that based on a flexible, pragmatic and non-formalistic interpretation of Article IV(2) NYC, the provision of only a partial translation of the arbitral award was sufficient, and that a more restrictive interpretation would run counter to the recognition and enforcement friendly spirit and objective of the NYC. The Bundesgericht also noted that the licensor had not claimed that it required a translation of the full award to safeguard its own legal rights. It also held that since it had interpreted Article IV(2) NYC as not requiring a translation of the entire award, it did not need to decide whether the same result could have been reached by application of more lenient requirements under Swiss domestic law in accordance with Article VII(1) NYC. As regards the licensor’s argument that the recognition and enforcement of the award would violate Swiss public policy, the Bundesgericht held that it did not need to address this defense since the licensor had in this regard simply resubmitted the same arguments that it had previously submitted to the Kantonsgericht, without addressing the Kantonsgericht’s reasoning for why the enforcement of the cost award did not violate Swiss public policy. see also : Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=1427&opac_view=6 Attachment (2)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Unofficial TranslationAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Spain Court Spain, Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Cataluña (High Court of Justice of Catalonia) Date 30 May 2012 Parties IMFC Licensing B.V. v. R.C.D. Espanyol de Barcelona S.A.D. Case number ATSJ CAT 272/2012 Applicable NYC Provisions IV | IV(1) | IV(1)(a) | IV(1)(b) | IV(2) | V | V(1) | V(1)(b) | V(1)(c) | V(2) | V(2)(a) | V(2)(b) Source Consejo General del Poder Judicial (Centro de Documentación Judicial – CENDOJ)
Languages Spanish Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=3989&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Spain Court Spain, Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Cataluña (High Court of Justice of Catalonia) Date 29 March 2012 Parties Ms Amazon River I CV v. Eurocondal Shipping S.A. Case number ATSJ CAT 103/2012 Applicable NYC Provisions II | II(2) | IV | IV(1) | IV(1)(a) | IV(1)(b) | IV(2) | V | V(1) | V(1)(a) | V(2) | V(2)(a) | V(2)(b) Source Consejo General del Poder Judicial (Centro de Documentación Judicial – CENDOJ)
Languages Spanish Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=3993&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Spain Court Spain, Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Cataluña (High Court of Justice of Catalonia) Date 15 March 2012 Parties Starlio Shipping Company Limited v. Eurocondal Shipping S.A. Case number ATSJ CAT 100/2012 Applicable NYC Provisions II | II(2) | IV | IV(1) | IV(1)(a) | IV(1)(b) | IV(2) | V | V(1) | V(1)(a) | V(2) | V(2)(a) | V(2)(b) Source Consejo General del Poder Judicial (Centro de Documentación Judicial – CENDOJ)
Languages Spanish Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=3994&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Austria Court Austria, Oberster Gerichtshof (Supreme Court) Date 14 March 2012 Parties C**** Ltd (Nigeria) v. M. **** GmbH Case number 3 Ob 248/11h Applicable NYC Provisions IV | V | VI | IV(1) | IV(1)(a) | V(1)(b) Source http://www.ris.bka.gv.at
Languages English Summary Summary in preparation Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=1639&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Spain Court Spain, Tribunal Superior de Justicia de la Comunidad Valenciana (High Court of Justice of the Valencian Community) Date 10 February 2012 Parties Marex Schifahrtsgesellschaft MBH, MS Wellington Express KG v. Maltese Sun Maritime Company Limited Case number ATSJ CV 19/2012 Applicable NYC Provisions I | II | IV | IV(1) | IV(1)(a) | V | V(1) | V(1)(b) Source Consejo General del Poder Judicial (Centro de Documentación Judicial – CENDOJ)
Languages Spanish Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=3997&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Spain Court Spain, Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Cataluña (High Court of Justice of Catalonia) Date 17 November 2011 Parties MK2 S.A. v. Wide Pictures S.L. Case number ATSJ CAT 525/2011 Applicable NYC Provisions II | II(2) | III | IV | IV(1) | IV(1)(a) | IV(1)(b) | V | V(1) | V(1)(e) | V(2) | V(2)(a) | V(2)(b) | VI Source Consejo General del Poder Judicial (Centro de Documentación Judicial – CENDOJ)
Languages Spanish Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=4001&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Switzerland Court Switzerland, Tribunal fédéral (Federal Tribunal) Date 10 October 2011 Case number 5A_427/2011 Applicable NYC Provisions V | V(2) | V(2)(b) | IV | IV(1) | IV(1)(b) Source http://www.bger.ch (website of Swiss Federal Tribunal)
Languages English Summary A and B concluded a contract for the delivery of goods from A to B. Bank acted as guarantor for B, agreeing to pay the price of goods upon the presentation of certain documents by A. These were presented and payment was made. Subsequently, B entertained doubts as to the authenticity of the documents and alleged that it had not received the agreed goods. B commenced an arbitration before the Syrian Council of State, relying on a pro forma invoice dated 22 February 2001 which provided for arbitration. The Council of State found that A had used a falsified inspection certificate in the documents submitted to the bank and that A did not participate in the proceedings. B’s bank also initiated criminal proceedings against A in France; the French court found there had been no fraud. B applied to the Tribunal of First Instance in Geneva, seeking to freeze A’s assets held by D’s bank in Geneva and enforce the award. In its application it submitted faxed copies of the invoice containing the arbitration agreement. The Tribunal of First Instance found for B; its decision was upheld on appeal. A appealed again. The Swiss Federal Tribunal dismissed A’s appeal. The Federal Tribunal held that Article IV(1)(b) NYC, which requires the original arbitration agreement to be submitted for an award to be enforceable, should not be interpreted in an excessively formalistic manner. It held that although that the document submitted was not the original invoice but a faxed copy, the authenticity of the document had not been challenged by A. Arguments by A that it had not been notified to participate in the proceedings (pursuant to Article V(1)(b) NYC) and that enforcement of the award would be contrary to Swiss public policy (Article V(2)(b) NYC) were unsuccessful on the facts. see also : Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=572&opac_view=6 Attachment (2)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Unofficial TranslationAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Austria Court Austria, Oberster Gerichtshof (Supreme Court) Date 24 August 2011 Parties C**** Ltd (Nigeria) v. M. **** GmbH Case number 3 Ob 65/11x Applicable NYC Provisions VI | V | IV | I | V(1)(e) | V(1)(b) | V(1)(a) | IV(1) | IV(1)(a) | I(1) | V(2)(b) Source http://www.ris.bka.gv.at
Languages English Summary Summary in preparation Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=1640&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country Albania Court Albania, Kolegjet e Bashkuara të Gjykatës së Lartë (Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court) Date 01 June 2011 Parties I.C.M.A. S.r.l and AGRI. BEN S.A. v. Ministria e Bujqësisë dhe Ushqimit Case number 6 Applicable NYC Provisions II | III | IV | IV(1) | IV(1)(b) | IV(2) | V | V(2) Source http://www.qbz.gov.al (website of the Official Gazette of the Republic of Albania)
Languages Albanian Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=4740&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
