sorted by (Publication date descending, Resource ascending) 

Russia / 24 May 2018 / Russia, Девятый арбитражный апелляционный суд (Ninth Arbitrazh Court of Appeal) / AO SAO “Gefest” v. General Reinsurance AG (Gen Re) / A40-125370/17

Country	Russia
Court	Russia, Девятый арбитражный апелляционный суд (Ninth Arbitrazh Court of Appeal)
Date	24 May 2018
Parties	AO SAO “Gefest” v. General Reinsurance AG (Gen Re)
Case number	A40-125370/17
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1) | II(3)
Source	http://kad.arbitr.ru (register of decisions of the RF arbitrazh courts)
Languages	Russian
affirms :	Russia / 22 November 2017 / Russia, Арбитражный суд города Москвы (Moscow Arbitrazh Court) / AO SAO “Gefest” v. General Reinsurance AG (Gen Re) / А40-125370/17-14-1006
see also :	Russia / 24 January 2018 / Russia, Девятый арбитражный апелляционный суд (Ninth Arbitrazh Court of Appeal) / AO SAO “Gefest” v. General Reinsurance AG (Gen Re) / A40-125370/17
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5011&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

Russia / 18 April 2018 / Russia, Арбитражный суд города Москвы (Moscow Arbitrazh Court) / AO SAO “Gefest” v. General Reinsurance AG (Gen Re) / А40-175297/17-29-1657

Country	Russia
Court	Russia, Арбитражный суд города Москвы (Moscow Arbitrazh Court)
Date	18 April 2018
Parties	AO SAO “Gefest” v. General Reinsurance AG (Gen Re)
Case number	А40-175297/17-29-1657
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1) | II(3)
Source	http://kad.arbitr.ru (register of decisions of the RF arbitrazh courts)
Languages	Russian
affirmed by :	Russia / 19 July 2018 / Russia, Девятый арбитражный апелляционный суд (Ninth Arbitrazh Court of Appeal) / AO SAO “Gefest” v. General Reinsurance AG (Gen Re) / А40-175297/17
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5036&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

Colombia / 23 March 2018 / Colombia, Corte Suprema de Justicia (Supreme Court of Justice) / Innovation Worldwide DMCC v. Carboexco C.I. Ltda. / 11001-02-03-000-2017-00080-00

Country	Colombia
Court	Colombia, Corte Suprema de Justicia (Supreme Court of Justice)
Date	23 March 2018
Parties	Innovation Worldwide DMCC v. Carboexco C.I. Ltda.
Case number	11001-02-03-000-2017-00080-00
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1) | III | IV | V | V(1) | V(2) | V(2)(b)
Source	http://www.cortesuprema.gov.co (website of the Corte Suprema de Justicia)
Languages	Spanish
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5166&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

Netherlands / 21 March 2018 / Netherlands, Rechtbank Rotterdam (District Court of Rotterdam) / Plaintiffs v. InterFeed B.V. / C/10/520361 / HA ZA 17-148

Country	Netherlands
Court	Netherlands, Rechtbank Rotterdam (District Court of Rotterdam)
Date	21 March 2018
Parties	Plaintiffs v. InterFeed B.V.
Case number	C/10/520361 / HA ZA 17-148
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1) | II(2)
Source	https://www.rechtspraak.nl (official website of the Netherlands judiciary system)
Languages	Dutch
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5944&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

India / 09 March 2018 / India, High Court of Madras / Anantara Solutions Private Ltd. v. Vinculum Solutions Private Ltd. / Original Petition No. 894 of 2017 and O.A. No. 675 of 2017

Country	India
Court	India, High Court of Madras
Date	09 March 2018
Parties	Anantara Solutions Private Ltd. v. Vinculum Solutions Private Ltd.
Case number	Original Petition No. 894 of 2017 and O.A. No. 675 of 2017
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1)
Source	http://www.indiankanoon.org (website of decisions of the Supreme Court as well as several High Courts)
Languages	English
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5615&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

Russia / 24 January 2018 / Russia, Девятый арбитражный апелляционный суд (Ninth Arbitrazh Court of Appeal) / AO SAO “Gefest” v. General Reinsurance AG (Gen Re) / A40-125370/17

Country	Russia
Court	Russia, Девятый арбитражный апелляционный суд (Ninth Arbitrazh Court of Appeal)
Date	24 January 2018
Parties	AO SAO “Gefest” v. General Reinsurance AG (Gen Re)
Case number	A40-125370/17
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1) | II(3)
Source	http://kad.arbitr.ru (register of decisions of the RF arbitrazh courts)
Languages	Russian
affirms :	Russia / 22 November 2017 / Russia, Арбитражный суд города Москвы (Moscow Arbitrazh Court) / AO SAO “Gefest” v. General Reinsurance AG (Gen Re) / А40-125370/17-14-1006
see also :	Russia / 24 May 2018 / Russia, Девятый арбитражный апелляционный суд (Ninth Arbitrazh Court of Appeal) / AO SAO “Gefest” v. General Reinsurance AG (Gen Re) / A40-125370/17
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5010&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

Netherlands / 13 December 2017 / Netherlands, Rechtbank Rotterdam (District Court of Rotterdam) / Cefetra B.V., Cefetra Ltd. v. MS ‘IDA’ Oekter Schifffahrtgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Rudolf A. Oetker KG / C/10/502148 / HA ZA 16-512

Country	Netherlands
Court	Netherlands, Rechtbank Rotterdam (District Court of Rotterdam)
Date	13 December 2017
Parties	Cefetra B.V., Cefetra Ltd. v. MS ‘IDA’ Oekter Schifffahrtgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Rudolf A. Oetker KG
Case number	C/10/502148 / HA ZA 16-512
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1) | II(3)
Source	https://www.rechtspraak.nl (official website of the Netherlands judiciary system)
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=4499&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

Netherlands / 28 November 2017 / Netherlands, Gerechtshof Den Haag (Court of Appeal of The Hague) / Vimac Consultancy B.V. v. Honeywell International Inc., Honeywell International SARL / 200.199.766

Country	Netherlands
Court	Netherlands, Gerechtshof Den Haag (Court of Appeal of The Hague)
Date	28 November 2017
Parties	Vimac Consultancy B.V. v. Honeywell International Inc., Honeywell International SARL
Case number	200.199.766
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1) | II(2) | II(3) | V | V(1)
Source	https://www.rechtspraak.nl (official website of the Netherlands judiciary system)
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=4501&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

Russia / 22 November 2017 / Russia, Арбитражный суд города Москвы (Moscow Arbitrazh Court) / AO SAO “Gefest” v. General Reinsurance AG (Gen Re) / А40-125370/17-14-1006

Country	Russia
Court	Russia, Арбитражный суд города Москвы (Moscow Arbitrazh Court)
Date	22 November 2017
Parties	AO SAO “Gefest” v. General Reinsurance AG (Gen Re)
Case number	А40-125370/17-14-1006
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1) | II(3)
Source	http://kad.arbitr.ru (register of decisions of the RF arbitrazh courts)
Languages	Russian
affirmed by :	Russia / 24 January 2018 / Russia, Девятый арбитражный апелляционный суд (Ninth Arbitrazh Court of Appeal) / AO SAO “Gefest” v. General Reinsurance AG (Gen Re) / A40-125370/17 Russia / 24 May 2018 / Russia, Девятый арбитражный апелляционный суд (Ninth Arbitrazh Court of Appeal) / AO SAO “Gefest” v. General Reinsurance AG (Gen Re) / A40-125370/17
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5009&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

Australia / 09 November 2017 / Australia, Supreme Court of New South Wales / Kennedy Miller Mitchell Films Pty Limited and Kennedy Miller Mitchell Services Pty Limited v. Warner Bros. Feature Productions Pty Limited and Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc. / 2017/268450

Country	Australia
Court	Australia, Supreme Court of New South Wales
Date	09 November 2017
Parties	Kennedy Miller Mitchell Films Pty Limited and Kennedy Miller Mitchell Services Pty Limited v. Warner Bros. Feature Productions Pty Limited and Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc.
Case number	2017/268450
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1) | II(2)
Source	[2017] NSWSC 1526 | http://www.caselaw.nsw.gov.au (New South Wales Caselaw website)
Languages	English
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6123&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

Russia / 26 October 2017 / Russia, Восьмой арбитражный апелляционный суд (Eighth Arbitrazh Court of Appeal) / OOO Energeticheskaya Companiya “Ural-Promyshlenniy – Ural Polyarniy” v. PSG-International a.s. / A81-4101/2016

Country	Russia
Court	Russia, Восьмой арбитражный апелляционный суд (Eighth Arbitrazh Court of Appeal)
Date	26 October 2017
Parties	OOO Energeticheskaya Companiya “Ural-Promyshlenniy – Ural Polyarniy” v. PSG-International a.s.
Case number	A81-4101/2016
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1) | II(3)
Source	http://kad.arbitr.ru (register of decisions of the RF arbitrazh courts)
Languages	Russian
affirmed by :	Russia / 19 January 2018 / Russia, Арбитражный суд Западно-Сибирского округа (Arbitrazh Court for the West-Siberian District) / OOO Energeticheskaya Companiya “Ural-Promyshlenniy – Ural Polyarniy” v. PSG-International a.s. / A81-4101/2016
affirms :	Russia / 23 August 2017 / Russia, Арбитражный суд Ямало-Ненецкого автономного округа (Arbitrazh Court of Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous District) / OOO Energeticheskaya Companiya “Ural-Promyshlenniy – Ural Polyarniy” v. PSG-International a.s. / A81-4101/2016
see also :	Russia / 07 September 2016 / Russia, Арбитражный суд Ямало-Ненецкого автономного округа (Arbitrazh Court of Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous District) / OOO Energeticheskaya Companiya “Ural-Promyshlenniy – Ural Polyarniy” v. PSG-International a.s. / A81-4101/2016 Russia / 02 February 2017 / Russia, Восьмой арбитражный апелляционный суд (Eighth Arbitrazh Court of Appeal) / OOO Energeticheskaya Companiya “Ural-Promyshlenniy – Ural Polyarniy” v. PSG-International a.s. / A81-4101/2016 Russia / 23 March 2017 / Russia, Арбитражный суд Западно-Сибирского округа (Arbitrazh Court for the West-Siberian District) / OOO Energeticheskaya Companiya “Ural-Promyshlenniy – Ural Polyarniy” v. PSG-International a.s. / A81-4101/2016
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5025&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

Uruguay / 09 October 2017 / Uruguay, Suprema Corte de Justicia (Supreme Court of Justice) / Brittania S.A.S. v. Tonisol S.A. / 843/2017

Country	Uruguay
Court	Uruguay, Suprema Corte de Justicia (Supreme Court of Justice)
Date	09 October 2017
Parties	Brittania S.A.S. v. Tonisol S.A.
Case number	843/2017
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1) | II(2) | III | IV | IV(1) | IV(1)(b) | IV(2) | V
Source	http://bjn.poderjudicial.gub.uy (website of the national public case law database)
Languages	Spanish
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5839&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

United States / 02 October 2017 / United States, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas Houston Division / OJSC Ukrnafta v. Carpatsky Petroleum Corp., et al. / H-09-891

Country	United States
Court	United States, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas Houston Division
Date	02 October 2017
Parties	OJSC Ukrnafta v. Carpatsky Petroleum Corp., et al.
Case number	H-09-891
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1) | II(2) | IV | IV(1) | IV(1)(a) | IV(1)(b) | IV(2) | V | V(1) | V(1)(a) | V(1)(b) | V(1)(c) | V(1)(d) | V(1)(e) | V(2) | V(2)(b)
Source	http://us-arbitration.shearman.com (Shearman & Sterling US International Arbitration Digest website)
affirmed by :	United States / 06 April 2020 / United States, U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit / OJSC Ukrnafta v. Carpatsky Petroleum Corporation / 19-20011
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=4559&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

Ukraine / 13 September 2017 / Ukraine, Вищий господарський суд України (High Commercial Court of Ukraine) / Doppelmayr Seilbahnen G.m.b.H. v. Private Production Enterprise “Sirius” / 910/19022/13

Country	Ukraine
Court	Ukraine, Вищий господарський суд України (High Commercial Court of Ukraine)
Date	13 September 2017
Parties	Doppelmayr Seilbahnen G.m.b.H. v. Private Production Enterprise “Sirius”
Case number	910/19022/13
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1)
Source	http://reyestr.court.gov.ua (website of the Unified State Register of Court Decisions)
Languages	Ukrainian
affirms :	Ukraine / 30 May 2017 / Ukraine, Київський апеляційний господарський суд (Commercial Court of Appeal of Kyiv) / Doppelmayr Seilbahnen GmbH v. Private production company “SIRIUS” / 910/19022/13
see also :	Ukraine / 06 March 2017 / Ukraine, Господарський суд міста Києва (Commercial Court of Kyiv) / Doppelmayr Seilbahnen GmbH v. Private production company “SIRIUS” / 910/19022/13
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=4860&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

United Kingdom / 05 September 2017 / England and Wales, High Court / Autoridad del Canal de Panamá v. Sacyr S.A., Salini-Impregilo S.p.A., Jan De Nul N.V., Constructora Urana S.A. and Sofidra S.A. / CL-2016-000741

Country	United Kingdom
Court	England and Wales, High Court
Date	05 September 2017
Parties	Autoridad del Canal de Panamá v. Sacyr S.A., Salini-Impregilo S.p.A., Jan De Nul N.V., Constructora Urana S.A. and Sofidra S.A.
Case number	CL-2016-000741
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1) | II(3)
Source	[2017] EWHC 2228 (Comm) | online: BAILII
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=4159&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

Russia / 23 August 2017 / Russia, Арбитражный суд Ямало-Ненецкого автономного округа (Arbitrazh Court of Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous District) / OOO Energeticheskaya Companiya “Ural-Promyshlenniy – Ural Polyarniy” v. PSG-International a.s. / A81-4101/2016

Country	Russia
Court	Russia, Арбитражный суд Ямало-Ненецкого автономного округа (Arbitrazh Court of Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous District)
Date	23 August 2017
Parties	OOO Energeticheskaya Companiya “Ural-Promyshlenniy – Ural Polyarniy” v. PSG-International a.s.
Case number	A81-4101/2016
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1) | II(3)
Source	http://kad.arbitr.ru (register of decisions of the RF arbitrazh courts)
Languages	Russian
affirmed by :	Russia / 19 January 2018 / Russia, Арбитражный суд Западно-Сибирского округа (Arbitrazh Court for the West-Siberian District) / OOO Energeticheskaya Companiya “Ural-Promyshlenniy – Ural Polyarniy” v. PSG-International a.s. / A81-4101/2016 Russia / 26 October 2017 / Russia, Восьмой арбитражный апелляционный суд (Eighth Arbitrazh Court of Appeal) / OOO Energeticheskaya Companiya “Ural-Promyshlenniy – Ural Polyarniy” v. PSG-International a.s. / A81-4101/2016
see also :	Russia / 07 September 2016 / Russia, Арбитражный суд Ямало-Ненецкого автономного округа (Arbitrazh Court of Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous District) / OOO Energeticheskaya Companiya “Ural-Promyshlenniy – Ural Polyarniy” v. PSG-International a.s. / A81-4101/2016 Russia / 02 February 2017 / Russia, Восьмой арбитражный апелляционный суд (Eighth Arbitrazh Court of Appeal) / OOO Energeticheskaya Companiya “Ural-Promyshlenniy – Ural Polyarniy” v. PSG-International a.s. / A81-4101/2016 Russia / 23 March 2017 / Russia, Арбитражный суд Западно-Сибирского округа (Arbitrazh Court for the West-Siberian District) / OOO Energeticheskaya Companiya “Ural-Promyshlenniy – Ural Polyarniy” v. PSG-International a.s. / A81-4101/2016
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5024&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

Ukraine / 31 May 2017 / Ukraine, The High Specialised Court of Ukraine for Civil and Criminal Cases / Ostchem Holding Limited v. Public Joint Stock Company “Odessa Port Plant” / 519/459/16-ц

Country	Ukraine
Court	Ukraine, The High Specialised Court of Ukraine for Civil and Criminal Cases
Date	31 May 2017
Parties	Ostchem Holding Limited v. Public Joint Stock Company “Odessa Port Plant”
Case number	519/459/16-ц
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1) | II(2) | IV | IV(1) | IV(1)(b) | IV(2)
Source	http://reyestr.court.gov.ua (website of the Unified State Register of Court Decisions)
affirms :	Ukraine / 04 October 2016 / Ukraine, Апеляційний суд Одеської області (Court of Appeal of Odessa Region) / Ostchem Holding Limited v. Public Joint Stock Company “Odessa Port Plant” / 519/459/16-ц
see also :	Ukraine / 25 July 2016 / Ukraine, Южний міський суд Одеської області (Iuzhnyi Municipal Court of Odessa Region) / Ostchem Holding Limited v. Public Joint Stock Company “Odessa Port Plant” / 519/459/16-ц Ukraine / 10 May 2017 / Ukraine, Апеляційний суд Одеської області (Court of Appeal of Odessa Region) / Ostchem Holding Limited v. Public Joint Stock Company “Odessa Port Plant” / 519/15/17 Ukraine / 06 March 2017 / Ukraine, Южний міський суд Одеської області (Iuzhnyi Municipal Court of Odessa Region) / Ostchem Holding Limited v. Public Joint Stock Company “Odessa Port Plant” / 519/15/17 Ukraine / 24 April 2019 / Ukraine, Київський апеляційний суд (Kyiv Court of Appeal) / Ostchem Holding Limited v. Public Joint Stock Company “Odessa Port Plant” / 824/241/2018
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=3873&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

Ukraine / 25 May 2017 / Ukraine, Господарський суд Вінницької області (Commercial Court of Vinnytsia Region) / “Vidas” Enterprise v. “Company ‘KMT’” LLC / 902/502/17

Country	Ukraine
Court	Ukraine, Господарський суд Вінницької області (Commercial Court of Vinnytsia Region)
Date	25 May 2017
Parties	“Vidas” Enterprise v. “Company ‘KMT’” LLC
Case number	902/502/17
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1)
Source	http://reyestr.court.gov.ua (website of the Unified State Register of Court Decisions)
Languages	Ukrainian
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=4873&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

Netherlands / 19 April 2017 / Netherlands, Rechtbank Gelderland (District Court of Gelderland) / 312298

Country	Netherlands
Court	Netherlands, Rechtbank Gelderland (District Court of Gelderland)
Date	19 April 2017
Case number	312298
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1) | II(2)
Source	https://www.rechtspraak.nl (official website of the Netherlands judiciary system)
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=4445&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

Russia / 23 March 2017 / Russia, Арбитражный суд Западно-Сибирского округа (Arbitrazh Court for the West-Siberian District) / OOO Energeticheskaya Companiya “Ural-Promyshlenniy – Ural Polyarniy” v. PSG-International a.s. / A81-4101/2016

Country	Russia
Court	Russia, Арбитражный суд Западно-Сибирского округа (Arbitrazh Court for the West-Siberian District)
Date	23 March 2017
Parties	OOO Energeticheskaya Companiya “Ural-Promyshlenniy – Ural Polyarniy” v. PSG-International a.s.
Case number	A81-4101/2016
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1) | II(3)
Source	http://kad.arbitr.ru (register of decisions of the RF arbitrazh courts)
Languages	Russian
affirms :	Russia / 02 February 2017 / Russia, Восьмой арбитражный апелляционный суд (Eighth Arbitrazh Court of Appeal) / OOO Energeticheskaya Companiya “Ural-Promyshlenniy – Ural Polyarniy” v. PSG-International a.s. / A81-4101/2016
see also :	Russia / 19 January 2018 / Russia, Арбитражный суд Западно-Сибирского округа (Arbitrazh Court for the West-Siberian District) / OOO Energeticheskaya Companiya “Ural-Promyshlenniy – Ural Polyarniy” v. PSG-International a.s. / A81-4101/2016 Russia / 23 August 2017 / Russia, Арбитражный суд Ямало-Ненецкого автономного округа (Arbitrazh Court of Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous District) / OOO Energeticheskaya Companiya “Ural-Promyshlenniy – Ural Polyarniy” v. PSG-International a.s. / A81-4101/2016 Russia / 26 October 2017 / Russia, Восьмой арбитражный апелляционный суд (Eighth Arbitrazh Court of Appeal) / OOO Energeticheskaya Companiya “Ural-Promyshlenniy – Ural Polyarniy” v. PSG-International a.s. / A81-4101/2016 Russia / 07 September 2016 / Russia, Арбитражный суд Ямало-Ненецкого автономного округа (Arbitrazh Court of Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous District) / OOO Energeticheskaya Companiya “Ural-Promyshlenniy – Ural Polyarniy” v. PSG-International a.s. / A81-4101/2016
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5028&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

United States / 23 March 2017 / United States, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida / B&B Jewelery, Inc. v. Pandora Jewelry LLC, et al. / 1:17-cv-20198-UU

Country	United States
Court	United States, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida
Date	23 March 2017
Parties	B&B Jewelery, Inc. v. Pandora Jewelry LLC, et al.
Case number	1:17-cv-20198-UU
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1) | II(2)
Source	online: PACER
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=3755&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

Australia / 25 January 2017 / Australia, Federal Court of Australia / Trina Solar (US) Inc v. Jasmin Solar Pty Ltd / QUD 1160 of 2015

Country	Australia
Court	Australia, Federal Court of Australia
Date	25 January 2017
Parties	Trina Solar (US) Inc v. Jasmin Solar Pty Ltd
Case number	QUD 1160 of 2015
Applicable NYC Provisions	I | II | II(1) | II(3) | III | V | V(1) | V(1)(a)
Source	[2017] FCAFC 6 | https://www.fedcourt.gov.au (website of the Federal Court of Australia)
Languages	English
affirms :	Australia / 17 December 2015 / Australia, Federal Court of Australia / Jasmin Solar Pty Ltd v. Trina Solar Australia Pty Ltd and Trina Solar (US) Inc / QUD 905 of 2015
see also :	Australia / 26 February 2016 / Australia, Federal Court of Australia / Trina Solar (US), Inc v. Jasmin Solar Pty Ltd / QUD 1160 of 2015
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6113&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

United States / 30 December 2016 / United States, U.S. District Court, District of Puerto Rico / Eazy Electronics & Technology, LLC, et al. v. LG Electronics, Inc., et al. / 16-1830 (GAG)

Country	United States
Court	United States, U.S. District Court, District of Puerto Rico
Date	30 December 2016
Parties	Eazy Electronics & Technology, LLC, et al. v. LG Electronics, Inc., et al.
Case number	16-1830 (GAG)
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1) | II(2) | II(3) | VIII
Source	http://us-arbitration.shearman.com (Shearman & Sterling US International Arbitration Digest website)
Languages	English
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=4111&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

Ukraine / 22 December 2016 / Ukraine, Печерський районний суд міста Києва (Pecherskyi District Court of Kyiv) / Millwill Ltd. v. Ukrayinski Agrarni Investytsii LLC / 757/37710/16-ц

Country	Ukraine
Court	Ukraine, Печерський районний суд міста Києва (Pecherskyi District Court of Kyiv)
Date	22 December 2016
Parties	Millwill Ltd. v. Ukrayinski Agrarni Investytsii LLC
Case number	757/37710/16-ц
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1) | II(2) | III | IV | V | V(1) | V(2)
Source	http://reyestr.court.gov.ua (website of the Unified State Register of Court Decisions)
affirmed by :	Ukraine / 08 February 2017 / Ukraine, Вищий спецiалiзований суд України з розгляду цивiльних i кримiнальних справ (The High Specialised Court of Ukraine for Civil and Criminal Cases) / Millwill Ltd. v. Ukrayinski Agrarni Investytsii LLC / 757/37710/16-ц
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=4186&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

Ukraine / 14 November 2016 / Ukraine, Київський апеляційний господарський суд (Commercial Court of Appeal of Kyiv) / “Gorodotskyi Zavod Budmaterialy” LLC v. PJSC Ukrsotsbank / 918/485/15

Country	Ukraine
Court	Ukraine, Київський апеляційний господарський суд (Commercial Court of Appeal of Kyiv)
Date	14 November 2016
Parties	“Gorodotskyi Zavod Budmaterialy” LLC v. PJSC Ukrsotsbank
Case number	918/485/15
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1)
Source	http://reyestr.court.gov.ua (website of the Unified State Register of Court Decisions)
Languages	Ukrainian
affirms :	Ukraine / 15 August 2016 / Ukraine, Господарський суд міста Києва (Commercial Court of Kyiv) / “Gorodotskyi Zavod Budmaterialy” LLC v. PJSC Ukrsotsbank / 918/485/15
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=4781&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

Ukraine / 08 November 2016 / Ukraine, Вищий господарський суд України (High Commercial Court of Ukraine) / State Entreprise “Odessa Sea Trade Port” v. Manchester Shipping S.A. / 916/4322/15

Country	Ukraine
Court	Ukraine, Вищий господарський суд України (High Commercial Court of Ukraine)
Date	08 November 2016
Parties	State Entreprise “Odessa Sea Trade Port” v. Manchester Shipping S.A.
Case number	916/4322/15
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1) | II(3)
Source	http://reyestr.court.gov.ua (website of the Unified State Register of Court Decisions)
Languages	Ukrainian
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=4786&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

Singapore / 31 October 2016 / Singapore, High Court / Dyna-Jet Pte Ltd v. Wilson Taylor Asia Pacific Pte Ltd / [2016] SGHC 238 | Suit No 1234 of 2015 (Registrar’s Appeal No 43 of 2016)

Country	Singapore
Court	Singapore, High Court
Date	31 October 2016
Parties	Dyna-Jet Pte Ltd v. Wilson Taylor Asia Pacific Pte Ltd
Case number	[2016] SGHC 238 | Suit No 1234 of 2015 (Registrar’s Appeal No 43 of 2016)
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1) | II(3)
Source	https://www.judiciary.gov.sg (website of the Singapore Courts)
Languages	English
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6399&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

Korea / 25 October 2016 / Korea, Seoul High Court / LSF-KDI Investment Company LTC v. KR&C Co., Ltd. / 2015Na29277

Country	Korea
Court	Korea, Seoul High Court
Date	25 October 2016
Parties	LSF-KDI Investment Company LTC v. KR&C Co., Ltd.
Case number	2015Na29277
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1) | III | IV | IV(1) | V | V(1) | V(1)(a) | V(1)(d) | V(2) | V(2)(b)
Source	https://casenote.kr
Languages	Korean
reversed by :	Korea / 13 December 2018 / Korea, Supreme Court of Korea / LSF-KDIC Investment Company, Ltd. v. KR&C Co., Ltd. / 2016Da49931 Korea / 20 August 2019 / Korea, Seoul High Court / LSF-KDIC Investment Company LTC v. KR&C Co., Ltd / 2018Na10878
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6436&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

China / 20 September 2016 / China, 广东省湛江市中级人民法院 (Guangdong, Zhanjiang Intermediate People’s Court) / 湛江安度斯生物有限公司 v. 广东三穗建筑工程有限公司 / (2016)粤08民辖终90号

Country	China
Court	China, 广东省湛江市中级人民法院 (Guangdong, Zhanjiang Intermediate People’s Court)
Date	20 September 2016
Parties	湛江安度斯生物有限公司 v. 广东三穗建筑工程有限公司
Case number	(2016)粤08民辖终90号
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1)
Source	http://wenshu.court.gov.cn (China Judgements Online)
Languages	Chinese
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6495&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

United States / 19 September 2016 / United States, U.S. District Court, District of Puerto Rico / Air-Con, Inc. v. Daikin Applied Latin America LLC, et al. / 15-2683 (GAG)

Country	United States
Court	United States, U.S. District Court, District of Puerto Rico
Date	19 September 2016
Parties	Air-Con, Inc. v. Daikin Applied Latin America LLC, et al.
Case number	15-2683 (GAG)
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1) | II(2)
Source	online: PACER
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=3729&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF