sorted by (Publication date descending, Resource ascending) 

Alex Dong / An Empirical Study on Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign, Hong Kong, Macau, and Taiwan Arbitral Awards in Mainland China / in Journal of International Arbitration, Kluwer Law International 2022, Volume 39 Issue 3) pp. 491-517 - 01/06/2022

Author(s)	Alex Dong
Source	in Journal of International Arbitration, Kluwer Law International 2022, Volume 39 Issue 3) pp. 491-517
Subject(s)	B. Articles on the recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards in specific countries and regions (including book chapters)
Jurisdictions	China
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | III | V | V(1)(a) | V(1)(b) | V(1)(c) | V(1)(d) | V(2)(b) | II(1) | II(2)
Worldcat Number	Worldcat : 9531412601
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6744&opac_view=6

United States / 07 October 2020 / United States, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida / Ryan Maunes Maglana and Francis Karl Bugayong v. Celebrity Cruises Inc. / 1:20-22133–CIV–MARTINEZ

Country	United States
Court	United States, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida
Date	07 October 2020
Parties	Ryan Maunes Maglana and Francis Karl Bugayong v. Celebrity Cruises Inc.
Case number	1:20-22133–CIV–MARTINEZ
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1)
Source	online: PACER
Languages	English
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6566&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

Netherlands / 09 September 2020 / Netherlands, Rechtbank Rotterdam (District Court of Rotterdam) / Ediola Shipping Ltd. v. Cefetra B.V. / C/10/585135 / HA ZA 19-1017

Country	Netherlands
Court	Netherlands, Rechtbank Rotterdam (District Court of Rotterdam)
Date	09 September 2020
Parties	Ediola Shipping Ltd. v. Cefetra B.V.
Case number	C/10/585135 / HA ZA 19-1017
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1) | II(3)
Source	https://www.rechtspraak.nl (official website of the Netherlands judiciary system)
Languages	Dutch
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6445&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

Lithuania / 03 July 2020 / Lithuania, Lietuvos Apeliacinis Teismas (Court of Appeal of Lithuania) / Dreymoor Fertilizers Overseas PTE LTD v. AVAGRO and AVAGRO LLC / e2T-34-943/2020

Country	Lithuania
Court	Lithuania, Lietuvos Apeliacinis Teismas (Court of Appeal of Lithuania)
Date	03 July 2020
Parties	Dreymoor Fertilizers Overseas PTE LTD v. AVAGRO and AVAGRO LLC
Case number	e2T-34-943/2020
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1) | II(2) | V | V(1) | V(1)(a) | V(1)(b) | V(1)(c) | V(2) | V(2)(a) | V(2)(b)
Source	https://www.apeliacinis.lt (website of the Court of Appeal of Lithuania)
Languages	Lithuanian
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6369&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

Netherlands / 01 July 2020 / Netherlands, Rechtbank Rotterdam (District Court of Rotterdam) / Universal Africa Lines Ltd v. Dumar Chartering B.V. / C/10/582568 / HA ZA 19-886

Country	Netherlands
Court	Netherlands, Rechtbank Rotterdam (District Court of Rotterdam)
Date	01 July 2020
Parties	Universal Africa Lines Ltd v. Dumar Chartering B.V.
Case number	C/10/582568 / HA ZA 19-886
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1) | II(2) | II(3)
Source	https://www.rechtspraak.nl (official website of the Netherlands judiciary system)
Languages	Dutch
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6254&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

United States / 01 June 2020 / United States, U.S. Supreme Court / GE Energy Power Conversion France SAS, Corp., formerly known as, Converteam SAS v. Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC et al. / 18-1048

Country	United States
Court	United States, U.S. Supreme Court
Date	01 June 2020
Parties	GE Energy Power Conversion France SAS, Corp., formerly known as, Converteam SAS v. Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC et al.
Case number	18-1048
Applicable NYC Provisions	I | I(1) | II | II(1) | II(2) | II(3) | III | IV | V | VI | VII | VII(1) | X | X(3)
Source	online: PACER
Languages	English
reverses :	United States / 30 August 2018 / United States, U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit / Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC, et al., Sompo Japan Insurance Company of America, et al. v. Converteam SAS, now known as GE Energy Power Conversion France SAS, Corp. / 17-10944
see also :	United States / 18 April 2019 / United States, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Alabama Southern Division / Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC, et al. v. Converteam SAS, now known as GE Energy Power Conversion France SAS, Corp. / 16-0378-KD-C United States / 19 March 2019 / United States, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Alabama Southern Division / Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC, et al. v. GE Energy SAS, known as GE Energy Power Conversion France SAS, Corp. / 1:16-cv-00378-KD-C
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6328&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

Melissa Magliana ; Philippe Hovaguimian / Dispensing with written consent – or consent altogether – in third-party extensions under the New York Convention: A critical examination of the recent Swiss and U.S. Supreme Court decisions in B. Suisse and GE Energy / in b-Arbitra | Belgian Review of Arbitration, Wolters Kluwer, Volume 2020 Issue 2 pp. 249-280 - 01/01/2020

Author(s)	Melissa Magliana ; Philippe Hovaguimian
Source	in b-Arbitra | Belgian Review of Arbitration, Wolters Kluwer, Volume 2020 Issue 2 pp. 249-280
Subject(s)	A. Articles on the 1958 New York Convention
Jurisdictions	Switzerland | United States
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1) | II(2) | II(3)
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6730&opac_view=6

United States / 17 October 2019 / United States, U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit / Sladjana Cvoro v. Carnival Corporation / 18-11815

Country	United States
Court	United States, U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Date	17 October 2019
Parties	Sladjana Cvoro v. Carnival Corporation
Case number	18-11815
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1) | III | V | V(2) | V(2)(b)
Source	online: PACER
Languages	English
affirms :	United States / 04 April 2018 / United States, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida / Sladjana Cvoro v. Carnival Corporation / 16-21559-CIV-MORENO
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5693&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

United States / 24 September 2019 / United States, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California / Waleed Al-Qarqani, et al. v. Chevron Corporation and Chevron U.S.A., Inc. / C 18-03297 JSW

Country	United States
Court	United States, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California
Date	24 September 2019
Parties	Waleed Al-Qarqani, et al. v. Chevron Corporation and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Case number	C 18-03297 JSW
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1) | II(2) | IV | IV(1) | IV(2) | V | V(1) | V(1)(d) | V(2)
Source	online: PACER
Languages	English
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5691&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

India / 18 September 2019 / India, High Court of Madhya Pradesh / Vimarsh Development Solutions Private Limited v. M.P. Consultancy Organisation (Ltd) MPCON / AC No. 28/2018

Country	India
Court	India, High Court of Madhya Pradesh
Date	18 September 2019
Parties	Vimarsh Development Solutions Private Limited v. M.P. Consultancy Organisation (Ltd) MPCON
Case number	AC No. 28/2018
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1) | II(3)
Source	http://www.indiankanoon.org (website of decisions of the Supreme Court as well as several High Courts)
Languages	English
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5817&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

United States / 15 July 2019 / United States, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida / Celio Moore v. Seven Seas Cruises S. de R.I., LLC and Voyager Vessel Company LLC / 19-22085-CIV-MORENO

Country	United States
Court	United States, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida
Date	15 July 2019
Parties	Celio Moore v. Seven Seas Cruises S. de R.I., LLC and Voyager Vessel Company LLC
Case number	19-22085-CIV-MORENO
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1) | II(2)
Source	online: PACER
Languages	English
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5576&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

Australia / 13 May 2019 / Australia, Federal Court of Australia / Degroma Trading Inc v. Viva Energy Australia Pty Ltd / VID 1588 of 2018

Country	Australia
Court	Australia, Federal Court of Australia
Date	13 May 2019
Parties	Degroma Trading Inc v. Viva Energy Australia Pty Ltd
Case number	VID 1588 of 2018
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1) | II(2)
Source	[2019] FCA 649 | https://www.fedcourt.gov.au (website of the Federal Court of Australia)
Languages	English
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6130&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

United States / 13 May 2019 / United States, U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit / McDonnel Group, L.L.C. v. Great Lakes Insurance SE, UK Branch, Lloyd’s Syndicates, CNP 4444 and CNP 958, Inter Hannover / 18-30817

Country	United States
Court	United States, U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Date	13 May 2019
Parties	McDonnel Group, L.L.C. v. Great Lakes Insurance SE, UK Branch, Lloyd’s Syndicates, CNP 4444 and CNP 958, Inter Hannover
Case number	18-30817
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1) | II(3)
Source	online: PACER
Languages	English
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5563&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

Ukraine / 27 March 2019 / Ukraine, Верховний Суд (Supreme Court) / Norbert Schaller Gesellschaft m.b.H v. First Investment Bank PJSC / 756/618/14-ц

Country	Ukraine
Court	Ukraine, Верховний Суд (Supreme Court)
Date	27 March 2019
Parties	Norbert Schaller Gesellschaft m.b.H v. First Investment Bank PJSC
Case number	756/618/14-ц
Applicable NYC Provisions	I | I(1) | II | II(1) | II(2) | III | V | V(1) | V(1)(a) | V(2)
Source	http://reyestr.court.gov.ua (website of the Unified State Register of Court Decisions)
Languages	Ukrainian
reversed by :	Ukraine / 05 July 2017 / Ukraine, Апеляційний суд міста Києва (Court of Appeal of Kyiv) / Norbert Schaller Gesellschaft m.b.H v. First Investment Bank PJSC / 756/618/14-ц
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5773&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

Ukraine / 27 March 2019 / Ukraine, Верховний Суд (Supreme Court) / Norbert Schaller Gesellschaft m.b.H v. First Investment Bank PJSC / 756/618/14-ц

Country	Ukraine
Court	Ukraine, Верховний Суд (Supreme Court)
Date	27 March 2019
Parties	Norbert Schaller Gesellschaft m.b.H v. First Investment Bank PJSC
Case number	756/618/14-ц
Applicable NYC Provisions	I | I(1) | II | II(1) | II(2) | III | V | V(1) | V(1)(a) | V(2)
Source	http://reyestr.court.gov.ua (website of the Unified State Register of Court Decisions)
Languages	Ukrainian
reversed by :	Ukraine / 05 July 2017 / Ukraine, Апеляційний суд міста Києва (Court of Appeal of Kyiv) / Norbert Schaller Gesellschaft m.b.H v. First Investment Bank PJSC / 756/618/14-ц
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5771&opac_view=6

Ukraine / 27 March 2019 / Ukraine, Верховний Суд (Supreme Court) / Norbert Schaller Gesellschaft m.b.H v. First Investment Bank PJSC / 756/618/14-ц

Country	Ukraine
Court	Ukraine, Верховний Суд (Supreme Court)
Date	27 March 2019
Parties	Norbert Schaller Gesellschaft m.b.H v. First Investment Bank PJSC
Case number	756/618/14-ц
Applicable NYC Provisions	I | I(1) | II | II(1) | II(2) | III | V | V(1) | V(1)(a) | V(2)
Source	http://reyestr.court.gov.ua (website of the Unified State Register of Court Decisions)
Languages	Ukrainian
reversed by :	Ukraine / 05 July 2017 / Ukraine, Апеляційний суд міста Києва (Court of Appeal of Kyiv) / Norbert Schaller Gesellschaft m.b.H v. First Investment Bank PJSC / 756/618/14-ц
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5772&opac_view=6

Sweden / 20 March 2019 / Sweden, Högsta domstolen (Supreme Court of Sweden) / Joint Stock Company Belgorkhimprom v. Koca Inșaat Sanayi Ihracat Anonim Șirketi / T 5437-17

Country	Sweden
Court	Sweden, Högsta domstolen (Supreme Court of Sweden)
Date	20 March 2019
Parties	Joint Stock Company Belgorkhimprom v. Koca Inșaat Sanayi Ihracat Anonim Șirketi
Case number	T 5437-17
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1) | V | V(1) | V(1)(b)
Source	Swedish Arbitration Portal, Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce
Languages	English
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5511&opac_view=6

Attachment (2)

Official Translation Adobe Acrobat PDF

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

United States / 12 February 2019 / United States, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida / Ytech 180 Units Miami Beach Investments LLC v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London, et al. / 18-24770-CV-GRAHAM

Country	United States
Court	United States, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida
Date	12 February 2019
Parties	Ytech 180 Units Miami Beach Investments LLC v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London, et al.
Case number	18-24770-CV-GRAHAM
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1) | II(3)
Source	online: PACER
Languages	English, Middle (ca. 1100-1500)
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5535&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

Singapore / 27 November 2018 / Singapore, Court of Appeal / Swissbourgh Diamond Mines (Pty) Ltd and others v. Kingdom of Lesotho / [2018] SGCA 81 | Civil Appeal No 149 of 2017

Country	Singapore
Court	Singapore, Court of Appeal
Date	27 November 2018
Parties	Swissbourgh Diamond Mines (Pty) Ltd and others v. Kingdom of Lesotho
Case number	[2018] SGCA 81 | Civil Appeal No 149 of 2017
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1) | V | V(1) | V(1)(c)
Source	https://www.judiciary.gov.sg (website of the Singapore Courts)
Languages	English
affirms :	Singapore / 14 August 2017 / Singapore, High Court / Kingdom of Lesotho v. Swissbourgh Diamond Mines (Pty) Limited and others / [2017] SGHC 195 | Originating Summons No 492 of 2016
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6401&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

Spain / 07 November 2018 / Spain, Tribunal Superior de Justicia del País Vasco (High Court of Justice of the Basque Country) / Bascotecnia S.A. v. Ingeteam Power Technology Energy S.A. et al.; Industrias Lagun Artea S.L. v. Aciéries de l’Ouest S.P.A. et al.; Ingeteam Power Technology Energy S.A. v. Aciéries de l’Ouest S.à r.l. (ADO) et al. / ATSJ PV 277/2018

Country	Spain
Court	Spain, Tribunal Superior de Justicia del País Vasco (High Court of Justice of the Basque Country)
Date	07 November 2018
Parties	Bascotecnia S.A. v. Ingeteam Power Technology Energy S.A. et al.; Industrias Lagun Artea S.L. v. Aciéries de l’Ouest S.P.A. et al.; Ingeteam Power Technology Energy S.A. v. Aciéries de l’Ouest S.à r.l. (ADO) et al.
Case number	ATSJ PV 277/2018
Applicable NYC Provisions	I | I(1) | II | II(1) | II(2) | II(3) | III | IV | IV(1) | IV(1)(b) | V | V(1) | V(1)(a) | V(1)(c) | V(2) | V(2)(b)
Source	Consejo General del Poder Judicial (Centro de Documentación Judicial – CENDOJ)
Languages	Spanish
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5746&opac_view=6

Spain / 07 November 2018 / Spain, Tribunal Superior de Justicia del País Vasco (High Court of Justice of the Basque Country) / Bascotecnia S.A. v. Ingeteam Power Technology Energy S.A. et al.; Industrias Lagun Artea S.L. v. Aciéries de l’Ouest S.P.A. et al.; Ingeteam Power Technology Energy S.A. v. Aciéries de l’Ouest S.à r.l. (ADO) et al. / ATSJ PV 277/2018

Country	Spain
Court	Spain, Tribunal Superior de Justicia del País Vasco (High Court of Justice of the Basque Country)
Date	07 November 2018
Parties	Bascotecnia S.A. v. Ingeteam Power Technology Energy S.A. et al.; Industrias Lagun Artea S.L. v. Aciéries de l’Ouest S.P.A. et al.; Ingeteam Power Technology Energy S.A. v. Aciéries de l’Ouest S.à r.l. (ADO) et al.
Case number	ATSJ PV 277/2018
Applicable NYC Provisions	I | I(1) | II | II(1) | II(2) | II(3) | III | IV | IV(1) | IV(1)(b) | V | V(1) | V(1)(a) | V(1)(c) | V(2) | V(2)(b)
Source	Consejo General del Poder Judicial (Centro de Documentación Judicial – CENDOJ)
Languages	Spanish
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5747&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

United States / 30 August 2018 / United States, U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit / Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC, et al., Sompo Japan Insurance Company of America, et al. v. Converteam SAS, now known as GE Energy Power Conversion France SAS, Corp. / 17-10944

Country	United States
Court	United States, U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Date	30 August 2018
Parties	Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC, et al., Sompo Japan Insurance Company of America, et al. v. Converteam SAS, now known as GE Energy Power Conversion France SAS, Corp.
Case number	17-10944
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1) | II(2)
Source	online: PACER
Languages	English
reversed by :	United States / 01 June 2020 / United States, U.S. Supreme Court / GE Energy Power Conversion France SAS, Corp., formerly known as, Converteam SAS v. Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC et al. / 18-1048
see also :	United States / 18 April 2019 / United States, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Alabama Southern Division / Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC, et al. v. Converteam SAS, now known as GE Energy Power Conversion France SAS, Corp. / 16-0378-KD-C United States / 19 March 2019 / United States, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Alabama Southern Division / Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC, et al. v. GE Energy SAS, known as GE Energy Power Conversion France SAS, Corp. / 1:16-cv-00378-KD-C
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5312&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

Korea / 26 July 2018 / Korea, Supreme Court of Korea / Crane Walnut Shelling, Inc. v. Shani Co., Ltd. / 2017Da225084

Country	Korea
Court	Korea, Supreme Court of Korea
Date	26 July 2018
Parties	Crane Walnut Shelling, Inc. v. Shani Co., Ltd.
Case number	2017Da225084
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1) | II(2) | V | V(1) | V(1)(a) | V(1)(e)
Source	https://casenote.kr
Languages	Korean
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6442&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

United Kingdom / 26 July 2018 / England and Wales, High Court / Franke Jan Sodzawiczny v. Andrew Joseph Ruhan and others / CL-2018-000328

Country	United Kingdom
Court	England and Wales, High Court
Date	26 July 2018
Parties	Franke Jan Sodzawiczny v. Andrew Joseph Ruhan and others
Case number	CL-2018-000328
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1) | II(3)
Source	[2018] EWHC 1908 (Comm) | online: BAILII
Languages	English
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5195&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

Russia / 19 July 2018 / Russia, Девятый арбитражный апелляционный суд (Ninth Arbitrazh Court of Appeal) / AO SAO “Gefest” v. General Reinsurance AG (Gen Re) / А40-175297/17

Country	Russia
Court	Russia, Девятый арбитражный апелляционный суд (Ninth Arbitrazh Court of Appeal)
Date	19 July 2018
Parties	AO SAO “Gefest” v. General Reinsurance AG (Gen Re)
Case number	А40-175297/17
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1) | II(3)
Source	http://kad.arbitr.ru (register of decisions of the RF arbitrazh courts)
Languages	Russian
affirms :	Russia / 18 April 2018 / Russia, Арбитражный суд города Москвы (Moscow Arbitrazh Court) / AO SAO “Gefest” v. General Reinsurance AG (Gen Re) / А40-175297/17-29-1657
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5253&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

Russia / 24 May 2018 / Russia, Девятый арбитражный апелляционный суд (Ninth Arbitrazh Court of Appeal) / AO SAO “Gefest” v. General Reinsurance AG (Gen Re) / A40-125370/17

Country	Russia
Court	Russia, Девятый арбитражный апелляционный суд (Ninth Arbitrazh Court of Appeal)
Date	24 May 2018
Parties	AO SAO “Gefest” v. General Reinsurance AG (Gen Re)
Case number	A40-125370/17
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1) | II(3)
Source	http://kad.arbitr.ru (register of decisions of the RF arbitrazh courts)
Languages	Russian
affirms :	Russia / 22 November 2017 / Russia, Арбитражный суд города Москвы (Moscow Arbitrazh Court) / AO SAO “Gefest” v. General Reinsurance AG (Gen Re) / А40-125370/17-14-1006
see also :	Russia / 24 January 2018 / Russia, Девятый арбитражный апелляционный суд (Ninth Arbitrazh Court of Appeal) / AO SAO “Gefest” v. General Reinsurance AG (Gen Re) / A40-125370/17
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5011&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

Russia / 18 April 2018 / Russia, Арбитражный суд города Москвы (Moscow Arbitrazh Court) / AO SAO “Gefest” v. General Reinsurance AG (Gen Re) / А40-175297/17-29-1657

Country	Russia
Court	Russia, Арбитражный суд города Москвы (Moscow Arbitrazh Court)
Date	18 April 2018
Parties	AO SAO “Gefest” v. General Reinsurance AG (Gen Re)
Case number	А40-175297/17-29-1657
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1) | II(3)
Source	http://kad.arbitr.ru (register of decisions of the RF arbitrazh courts)
Languages	Russian
affirmed by :	Russia / 19 July 2018 / Russia, Девятый арбитражный апелляционный суд (Ninth Arbitrazh Court of Appeal) / AO SAO “Gefest” v. General Reinsurance AG (Gen Re) / А40-175297/17
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5036&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

Colombia / 23 March 2018 / Colombia, Corte Suprema de Justicia (Supreme Court of Justice) / Innovation Worldwide DMCC v. Carboexco C.I. Ltda. / 11001-02-03-000-2017-00080-00

Country	Colombia
Court	Colombia, Corte Suprema de Justicia (Supreme Court of Justice)
Date	23 March 2018
Parties	Innovation Worldwide DMCC v. Carboexco C.I. Ltda.
Case number	11001-02-03-000-2017-00080-00
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1) | III | IV | V | V(1) | V(2) | V(2)(b)
Source	http://www.cortesuprema.gov.co (website of the Corte Suprema de Justicia)
Languages	Spanish
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5166&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

Netherlands / 21 March 2018 / Netherlands, Rechtbank Rotterdam (District Court of Rotterdam) / Plaintiffs v. InterFeed B.V. / C/10/520361 / HA ZA 17-148

Country	Netherlands
Court	Netherlands, Rechtbank Rotterdam (District Court of Rotterdam)
Date	21 March 2018
Parties	Plaintiffs v. InterFeed B.V.
Case number	C/10/520361 / HA ZA 17-148
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1) | II(2)
Source	https://www.rechtspraak.nl (official website of the Netherlands judiciary system)
Languages	Dutch
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5944&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

India / 09 March 2018 / India, High Court of Madras / Anantara Solutions Private Ltd. v. Vinculum Solutions Private Ltd. / Original Petition No. 894 of 2017 and O.A. No. 675 of 2017

Country	India
Court	India, High Court of Madras
Date	09 March 2018
Parties	Anantara Solutions Private Ltd. v. Vinculum Solutions Private Ltd.
Case number	Original Petition No. 894 of 2017 and O.A. No. 675 of 2017
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1)
Source	http://www.indiankanoon.org (website of decisions of the Supreme Court as well as several High Courts)
Languages	English
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5615&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

Russia / 24 January 2018 / Russia, Девятый арбитражный апелляционный суд (Ninth Arbitrazh Court of Appeal) / AO SAO “Gefest” v. General Reinsurance AG (Gen Re) / A40-125370/17

Country	Russia
Court	Russia, Девятый арбитражный апелляционный суд (Ninth Arbitrazh Court of Appeal)
Date	24 January 2018
Parties	AO SAO “Gefest” v. General Reinsurance AG (Gen Re)
Case number	A40-125370/17
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1) | II(3)
Source	http://kad.arbitr.ru (register of decisions of the RF arbitrazh courts)
Languages	Russian
affirms :	Russia / 22 November 2017 / Russia, Арбитражный суд города Москвы (Moscow Arbitrazh Court) / AO SAO “Gefest” v. General Reinsurance AG (Gen Re) / А40-125370/17-14-1006
see also :	Russia / 24 May 2018 / Russia, Девятый арбитражный апелляционный суд (Ninth Arbitrazh Court of Appeal) / AO SAO “Gefest” v. General Reinsurance AG (Gen Re) / A40-125370/17
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5010&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

Netherlands / 13 December 2017 / Netherlands, Rechtbank Rotterdam (District Court of Rotterdam) / Cefetra B.V., Cefetra Ltd. v. MS ‘IDA’ Oekter Schifffahrtgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Rudolf A. Oetker KG / C/10/502148 / HA ZA 16-512

Country	Netherlands
Court	Netherlands, Rechtbank Rotterdam (District Court of Rotterdam)
Date	13 December 2017
Parties	Cefetra B.V., Cefetra Ltd. v. MS ‘IDA’ Oekter Schifffahrtgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Rudolf A. Oetker KG
Case number	C/10/502148 / HA ZA 16-512
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1) | II(3)
Source	https://www.rechtspraak.nl (official website of the Netherlands judiciary system)
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=4499&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

Netherlands / 28 November 2017 / Netherlands, Gerechtshof Den Haag (Court of Appeal of The Hague) / Vimac Consultancy B.V. v. Honeywell International Inc., Honeywell International SARL / 200.199.766

Country	Netherlands
Court	Netherlands, Gerechtshof Den Haag (Court of Appeal of The Hague)
Date	28 November 2017
Parties	Vimac Consultancy B.V. v. Honeywell International Inc., Honeywell International SARL
Case number	200.199.766
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1) | II(2) | II(3) | V | V(1)
Source	https://www.rechtspraak.nl (official website of the Netherlands judiciary system)
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=4501&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

Russia / 22 November 2017 / Russia, Арбитражный суд города Москвы (Moscow Arbitrazh Court) / AO SAO “Gefest” v. General Reinsurance AG (Gen Re) / А40-125370/17-14-1006

Country	Russia
Court	Russia, Арбитражный суд города Москвы (Moscow Arbitrazh Court)
Date	22 November 2017
Parties	AO SAO “Gefest” v. General Reinsurance AG (Gen Re)
Case number	А40-125370/17-14-1006
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1) | II(3)
Source	http://kad.arbitr.ru (register of decisions of the RF arbitrazh courts)
Languages	Russian
affirmed by :	Russia / 24 January 2018 / Russia, Девятый арбитражный апелляционный суд (Ninth Arbitrazh Court of Appeal) / AO SAO “Gefest” v. General Reinsurance AG (Gen Re) / A40-125370/17 Russia / 24 May 2018 / Russia, Девятый арбитражный апелляционный суд (Ninth Arbitrazh Court of Appeal) / AO SAO “Gefest” v. General Reinsurance AG (Gen Re) / A40-125370/17
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5009&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

Australia / 09 November 2017 / Australia, Supreme Court of New South Wales / Kennedy Miller Mitchell Films Pty Limited and Kennedy Miller Mitchell Services Pty Limited v. Warner Bros. Feature Productions Pty Limited and Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc. / 2017/268450

Country	Australia
Court	Australia, Supreme Court of New South Wales
Date	09 November 2017
Parties	Kennedy Miller Mitchell Films Pty Limited and Kennedy Miller Mitchell Services Pty Limited v. Warner Bros. Feature Productions Pty Limited and Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc.
Case number	2017/268450
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1) | II(2)
Source	[2017] NSWSC 1526 | http://www.caselaw.nsw.gov.au (New South Wales Caselaw website)
Languages	English
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6123&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

Russia / 26 October 2017 / Russia, Восьмой арбитражный апелляционный суд (Eighth Arbitrazh Court of Appeal) / OOO Energeticheskaya Companiya “Ural-Promyshlenniy – Ural Polyarniy” v. PSG-International a.s. / A81-4101/2016

Country	Russia
Court	Russia, Восьмой арбитражный апелляционный суд (Eighth Arbitrazh Court of Appeal)
Date	26 October 2017
Parties	OOO Energeticheskaya Companiya “Ural-Promyshlenniy – Ural Polyarniy” v. PSG-International a.s.
Case number	A81-4101/2016
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1) | II(3)
Source	http://kad.arbitr.ru (register of decisions of the RF arbitrazh courts)
Languages	Russian
affirmed by :	Russia / 19 January 2018 / Russia, Арбитражный суд Западно-Сибирского округа (Arbitrazh Court for the West-Siberian District) / OOO Energeticheskaya Companiya “Ural-Promyshlenniy – Ural Polyarniy” v. PSG-International a.s. / A81-4101/2016
affirms :	Russia / 23 August 2017 / Russia, Арбитражный суд Ямало-Ненецкого автономного округа (Arbitrazh Court of Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous District) / OOO Energeticheskaya Companiya “Ural-Promyshlenniy – Ural Polyarniy” v. PSG-International a.s. / A81-4101/2016
see also :	Russia / 07 September 2016 / Russia, Арбитражный суд Ямало-Ненецкого автономного округа (Arbitrazh Court of Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous District) / OOO Energeticheskaya Companiya “Ural-Promyshlenniy – Ural Polyarniy” v. PSG-International a.s. / A81-4101/2016 Russia / 02 February 2017 / Russia, Восьмой арбитражный апелляционный суд (Eighth Arbitrazh Court of Appeal) / OOO Energeticheskaya Companiya “Ural-Promyshlenniy – Ural Polyarniy” v. PSG-International a.s. / A81-4101/2016 Russia / 23 March 2017 / Russia, Арбитражный суд Западно-Сибирского округа (Arbitrazh Court for the West-Siberian District) / OOO Energeticheskaya Companiya “Ural-Promyshlenniy – Ural Polyarniy” v. PSG-International a.s. / A81-4101/2016
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5025&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

Uruguay / 09 October 2017 / Uruguay, Suprema Corte de Justicia (Supreme Court of Justice) / Brittania S.A.S. v. Tonisol S.A. / 843/2017

Country	Uruguay
Court	Uruguay, Suprema Corte de Justicia (Supreme Court of Justice)
Date	09 October 2017
Parties	Brittania S.A.S. v. Tonisol S.A.
Case number	843/2017
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1) | II(2) | III | IV | IV(1) | IV(1)(b) | IV(2) | V
Source	http://bjn.poderjudicial.gub.uy (website of the national public case law database)
Languages	Spanish
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5839&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

United States / 02 October 2017 / United States, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas Houston Division / OJSC Ukrnafta v. Carpatsky Petroleum Corp., et al. / H-09-891

Country	United States
Court	United States, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas Houston Division
Date	02 October 2017
Parties	OJSC Ukrnafta v. Carpatsky Petroleum Corp., et al.
Case number	H-09-891
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1) | II(2) | IV | IV(1) | IV(1)(a) | IV(1)(b) | IV(2) | V | V(1) | V(1)(a) | V(1)(b) | V(1)(c) | V(1)(d) | V(1)(e) | V(2) | V(2)(b)
Source	http://us-arbitration.shearman.com (Shearman & Sterling US International Arbitration Digest website)
affirmed by :	United States / 06 April 2020 / United States, U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit / OJSC Ukrnafta v. Carpatsky Petroleum Corporation / 19-20011
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=4559&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

Ukraine / 13 September 2017 / Ukraine, Вищий господарський суд України (High Commercial Court of Ukraine) / Doppelmayr Seilbahnen G.m.b.H. v. Private Production Enterprise “Sirius” / 910/19022/13

Country	Ukraine
Court	Ukraine, Вищий господарський суд України (High Commercial Court of Ukraine)
Date	13 September 2017
Parties	Doppelmayr Seilbahnen G.m.b.H. v. Private Production Enterprise “Sirius”
Case number	910/19022/13
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1)
Source	http://reyestr.court.gov.ua (website of the Unified State Register of Court Decisions)
Languages	Ukrainian
affirms :	Ukraine / 30 May 2017 / Ukraine, Київський апеляційний господарський суд (Commercial Court of Appeal of Kyiv) / Doppelmayr Seilbahnen GmbH v. Private production company “SIRIUS” / 910/19022/13
see also :	Ukraine / 06 March 2017 / Ukraine, Господарський суд міста Києва (Commercial Court of Kyiv) / Doppelmayr Seilbahnen GmbH v. Private production company “SIRIUS” / 910/19022/13
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=4860&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

United Kingdom / 05 September 2017 / England and Wales, High Court / Autoridad del Canal de Panamá v. Sacyr S.A., Salini-Impregilo S.p.A., Jan De Nul N.V., Constructora Urana S.A. and Sofidra S.A. / CL-2016-000741

Country	United Kingdom
Court	England and Wales, High Court
Date	05 September 2017
Parties	Autoridad del Canal de Panamá v. Sacyr S.A., Salini-Impregilo S.p.A., Jan De Nul N.V., Constructora Urana S.A. and Sofidra S.A.
Case number	CL-2016-000741
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1) | II(3)
Source	[2017] EWHC 2228 (Comm) | online: BAILII
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=4159&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

Russia / 23 August 2017 / Russia, Арбитражный суд Ямало-Ненецкого автономного округа (Arbitrazh Court of Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous District) / OOO Energeticheskaya Companiya “Ural-Promyshlenniy – Ural Polyarniy” v. PSG-International a.s. / A81-4101/2016

Country	Russia
Court	Russia, Арбитражный суд Ямало-Ненецкого автономного округа (Arbitrazh Court of Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous District)
Date	23 August 2017
Parties	OOO Energeticheskaya Companiya “Ural-Promyshlenniy – Ural Polyarniy” v. PSG-International a.s.
Case number	A81-4101/2016
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1) | II(3)
Source	http://kad.arbitr.ru (register of decisions of the RF arbitrazh courts)
Languages	Russian
affirmed by :	Russia / 19 January 2018 / Russia, Арбитражный суд Западно-Сибирского округа (Arbitrazh Court for the West-Siberian District) / OOO Energeticheskaya Companiya “Ural-Promyshlenniy – Ural Polyarniy” v. PSG-International a.s. / A81-4101/2016 Russia / 26 October 2017 / Russia, Восьмой арбитражный апелляционный суд (Eighth Arbitrazh Court of Appeal) / OOO Energeticheskaya Companiya “Ural-Promyshlenniy – Ural Polyarniy” v. PSG-International a.s. / A81-4101/2016
see also :	Russia / 07 September 2016 / Russia, Арбитражный суд Ямало-Ненецкого автономного округа (Arbitrazh Court of Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous District) / OOO Energeticheskaya Companiya “Ural-Promyshlenniy – Ural Polyarniy” v. PSG-International a.s. / A81-4101/2016 Russia / 02 February 2017 / Russia, Восьмой арбитражный апелляционный суд (Eighth Arbitrazh Court of Appeal) / OOO Energeticheskaya Companiya “Ural-Promyshlenniy – Ural Polyarniy” v. PSG-International a.s. / A81-4101/2016 Russia / 23 March 2017 / Russia, Арбитражный суд Западно-Сибирского округа (Arbitrazh Court for the West-Siberian District) / OOO Energeticheskaya Companiya “Ural-Promyshlenniy – Ural Polyarniy” v. PSG-International a.s. / A81-4101/2016
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5024&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

Ukraine / 31 May 2017 / Ukraine, The High Specialised Court of Ukraine for Civil and Criminal Cases / Ostchem Holding Limited v. Public Joint Stock Company “Odessa Port Plant” / 519/459/16-ц

Country	Ukraine
Court	Ukraine, The High Specialised Court of Ukraine for Civil and Criminal Cases
Date	31 May 2017
Parties	Ostchem Holding Limited v. Public Joint Stock Company “Odessa Port Plant”
Case number	519/459/16-ц
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1) | II(2) | IV | IV(1) | IV(1)(b) | IV(2)
Source	http://reyestr.court.gov.ua (website of the Unified State Register of Court Decisions)
affirms :	Ukraine / 04 October 2016 / Ukraine, Апеляційний суд Одеської області (Court of Appeal of Odessa Region) / Ostchem Holding Limited v. Public Joint Stock Company “Odessa Port Plant” / 519/459/16-ц
see also :	Ukraine / 25 July 2016 / Ukraine, Южний міський суд Одеської області (Iuzhnyi Municipal Court of Odessa Region) / Ostchem Holding Limited v. Public Joint Stock Company “Odessa Port Plant” / 519/459/16-ц Ukraine / 10 May 2017 / Ukraine, Апеляційний суд Одеської області (Court of Appeal of Odessa Region) / Ostchem Holding Limited v. Public Joint Stock Company “Odessa Port Plant” / 519/15/17 Ukraine / 06 March 2017 / Ukraine, Южний міський суд Одеської області (Iuzhnyi Municipal Court of Odessa Region) / Ostchem Holding Limited v. Public Joint Stock Company “Odessa Port Plant” / 519/15/17 Ukraine / 24 April 2019 / Ukraine, Київський апеляційний суд (Kyiv Court of Appeal) / Ostchem Holding Limited v. Public Joint Stock Company “Odessa Port Plant” / 824/241/2018
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=3873&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

Ukraine / 25 May 2017 / Ukraine, Господарський суд Вінницької області (Commercial Court of Vinnytsia Region) / “Vidas” Enterprise v. “Company ‘KMT’” LLC / 902/502/17

Country	Ukraine
Court	Ukraine, Господарський суд Вінницької області (Commercial Court of Vinnytsia Region)
Date	25 May 2017
Parties	“Vidas” Enterprise v. “Company ‘KMT’” LLC
Case number	902/502/17
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1)
Source	http://reyestr.court.gov.ua (website of the Unified State Register of Court Decisions)
Languages	Ukrainian
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=4873&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

Netherlands / 19 April 2017 / Netherlands, Rechtbank Gelderland (District Court of Gelderland) / 312298

Country	Netherlands
Court	Netherlands, Rechtbank Gelderland (District Court of Gelderland)
Date	19 April 2017
Case number	312298
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1) | II(2)
Source	https://www.rechtspraak.nl (official website of the Netherlands judiciary system)
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=4445&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

Russia / 23 March 2017 / Russia, Арбитражный суд Западно-Сибирского округа (Arbitrazh Court for the West-Siberian District) / OOO Energeticheskaya Companiya “Ural-Promyshlenniy – Ural Polyarniy” v. PSG-International a.s. / A81-4101/2016

Country	Russia
Court	Russia, Арбитражный суд Западно-Сибирского округа (Arbitrazh Court for the West-Siberian District)
Date	23 March 2017
Parties	OOO Energeticheskaya Companiya “Ural-Promyshlenniy – Ural Polyarniy” v. PSG-International a.s.
Case number	A81-4101/2016
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1) | II(3)
Source	http://kad.arbitr.ru (register of decisions of the RF arbitrazh courts)
Languages	Russian
affirms :	Russia / 02 February 2017 / Russia, Восьмой арбитражный апелляционный суд (Eighth Arbitrazh Court of Appeal) / OOO Energeticheskaya Companiya “Ural-Promyshlenniy – Ural Polyarniy” v. PSG-International a.s. / A81-4101/2016
see also :	Russia / 19 January 2018 / Russia, Арбитражный суд Западно-Сибирского округа (Arbitrazh Court for the West-Siberian District) / OOO Energeticheskaya Companiya “Ural-Promyshlenniy – Ural Polyarniy” v. PSG-International a.s. / A81-4101/2016 Russia / 23 August 2017 / Russia, Арбитражный суд Ямало-Ненецкого автономного округа (Arbitrazh Court of Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous District) / OOO Energeticheskaya Companiya “Ural-Promyshlenniy – Ural Polyarniy” v. PSG-International a.s. / A81-4101/2016 Russia / 26 October 2017 / Russia, Восьмой арбитражный апелляционный суд (Eighth Arbitrazh Court of Appeal) / OOO Energeticheskaya Companiya “Ural-Promyshlenniy – Ural Polyarniy” v. PSG-International a.s. / A81-4101/2016 Russia / 07 September 2016 / Russia, Арбитражный суд Ямало-Ненецкого автономного округа (Arbitrazh Court of Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous District) / OOO Energeticheskaya Companiya “Ural-Promyshlenniy – Ural Polyarniy” v. PSG-International a.s. / A81-4101/2016
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5028&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

United States / 23 March 2017 / United States, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida / B&B Jewelery, Inc. v. Pandora Jewelry LLC, et al. / 1:17-cv-20198-UU

Country	United States
Court	United States, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida
Date	23 March 2017
Parties	B&B Jewelery, Inc. v. Pandora Jewelry LLC, et al.
Case number	1:17-cv-20198-UU
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1) | II(2)
Source	online: PACER
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=3755&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

Australia / 25 January 2017 / Australia, Federal Court of Australia / Trina Solar (US) Inc v. Jasmin Solar Pty Ltd / QUD 1160 of 2015

Country	Australia
Court	Australia, Federal Court of Australia
Date	25 January 2017
Parties	Trina Solar (US) Inc v. Jasmin Solar Pty Ltd
Case number	QUD 1160 of 2015
Applicable NYC Provisions	I | II | II(1) | II(3) | III | V | V(1) | V(1)(a)
Source	[2017] FCAFC 6 | https://www.fedcourt.gov.au (website of the Federal Court of Australia)
Languages	English
affirms :	Australia / 17 December 2015 / Australia, Federal Court of Australia / Jasmin Solar Pty Ltd v. Trina Solar Australia Pty Ltd and Trina Solar (US) Inc / QUD 905 of 2015
see also :	Australia / 26 February 2016 / Australia, Federal Court of Australia / Trina Solar (US), Inc v. Jasmin Solar Pty Ltd / QUD 1160 of 2015
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6113&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

United States / 30 December 2016 / United States, U.S. District Court, District of Puerto Rico / Eazy Electronics & Technology, LLC, et al. v. LG Electronics, Inc., et al. / 16-1830 (GAG)

Country	United States
Court	United States, U.S. District Court, District of Puerto Rico
Date	30 December 2016
Parties	Eazy Electronics & Technology, LLC, et al. v. LG Electronics, Inc., et al.
Case number	16-1830 (GAG)
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1) | II(2) | II(3) | VIII
Source	http://us-arbitration.shearman.com (Shearman & Sterling US International Arbitration Digest website)
Languages	English
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=4111&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

Ukraine / 22 December 2016 / Ukraine, Печерський районний суд міста Києва (Pecherskyi District Court of Kyiv) / Millwill Ltd. v. Ukrayinski Agrarni Investytsii LLC / 757/37710/16-ц

Country	Ukraine
Court	Ukraine, Печерський районний суд міста Києва (Pecherskyi District Court of Kyiv)
Date	22 December 2016
Parties	Millwill Ltd. v. Ukrayinski Agrarni Investytsii LLC
Case number	757/37710/16-ц
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1) | II(2) | III | IV | V | V(1) | V(2)
Source	http://reyestr.court.gov.ua (website of the Unified State Register of Court Decisions)
affirmed by :	Ukraine / 08 February 2017 / Ukraine, Вищий спецiалiзований суд України з розгляду цивiльних i кримiнальних справ (The High Specialised Court of Ukraine for Civil and Criminal Cases) / Millwill Ltd. v. Ukrayinski Agrarni Investytsii LLC / 757/37710/16-ц
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=4186&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF

Ukraine / 14 November 2016 / Ukraine, Київський апеляційний господарський суд (Commercial Court of Appeal of Kyiv) / “Gorodotskyi Zavod Budmaterialy” LLC v. PJSC Ukrsotsbank / 918/485/15

Country	Ukraine
Court	Ukraine, Київський апеляційний господарський суд (Commercial Court of Appeal of Kyiv)
Date	14 November 2016
Parties	“Gorodotskyi Zavod Budmaterialy” LLC v. PJSC Ukrsotsbank
Case number	918/485/15
Applicable NYC Provisions	II | II(1)
Source	http://reyestr.court.gov.ua (website of the Unified State Register of Court Decisions)
Languages	Ukrainian
affirms :	Ukraine / 15 August 2016 / Ukraine, Господарський суд міста Києва (Commercial Court of Kyiv) / “Gorodotskyi Zavod Budmaterialy” LLC v. PJSC Ukrsotsbank / 918/485/15
Link to the record	https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=4781&opac_view=6

Attachment (1)

Original Language Adobe Acrobat PDF