China, 广州海事法院 (Guangzhou Maritime Court)
Available documents (7)
sorted by (Publication date descending, Resource ascending) Add to selection
Quick view
Refine your search
China / 17 June 2020 / China, 广州海事法院 (Guangzhou Maritime Court) / 安富尔自由贸易区公司 (Emphor FZCO) v. 广东粤新海洋工程装备股份有限公司 / (2020)粤72协外认1号
Country China Court China, 广州海事法院 (Guangzhou Maritime Court) Date 17 June 2020 Parties 安富尔自由贸易区公司 (Emphor FZCO) v. 广东粤新海洋工程装备股份有限公司 Case number (2020)粤72协外认1号 Applicable NYC Provisions IV | V | V(1) | V(1)(b) | V(1)(c) | V(2) Source http://wenshu.court.gov.cn (China Judgements Online)
Languages Chinese Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6556&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country China Court China, 广州海事法院 (Guangzhou Maritime Court) Date 13 November 2018 Parties 广东中远海运重工有限公司 v. 布兰科公司 (Bramco W.L.L.) Case number (2018)粤72协外认2号 Applicable NYC Provisions IV | V | V(1) | V(2) Source http://wenshu.court.gov.cn (China Judgements Online)
Languages Chinese Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6518&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country China Court China, 广州海事法院 (Guangzhou Maritime Court) Date 12 October 2018 Parties 东亚油轮公司 (Dong-A Tanker Corporation) v. 长成新能股份有限公司 Case number (2018)粤72 协外认1 号 Applicable NYC Provisions IV | V | V(1) | V(2) Source http://wenshu.court.gov.cn (China Judgements Online)
Languages Chinese Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6517&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country China Court China, 广州海事法院 (Guangzhou Maritime Court) Date 31 May 2018 Parties 中远散货运输（集团）有限公司 v. 沃洋国际有限公司 (WOL Ocean International Co., Ltd) Case number (2016)粤72协外认1号 Applicable NYC Provisions IV | V | V(1) | V(2) Source http://wenshu.court.gov.cn (China Judgements Online)
Languages Chinese Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6513&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country China Court China, 广州海事法院 (Guangzhou Maritime Court) Date 11 December 2017 Parties 西海航运有限公司 (West Ocean Shipping Company Limited) v. 深圳市南海船务有限公司 Case number (2017)粤72协外认1号 Applicable NYC Provisions IV | V | V(1) | V(2) Source http://wenshu.court.gov.cn (China Judgements Online)
Languages Chinese Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=6506&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original LanguageAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country China Court China, 广州海事法院 (Guangzhou Maritime Court) Date 06 December 2002 Parties Viking Ship Finance Ltd. v. Castelli Holding Inc. Case number [2002] 广海法他字弟2号 / [2002] GuangHaiFaTaZi No. 2 Applicable NYC Provisions V Languages English Summary On 13 July 1999, Viking Ship Finance Ltd. (“Viking Ship”) entered into a loan agreement with Castelli Holding Inc. (“Castelli”). A dispute arose between the parties and, on 14 September 2000, both parties agreed to bring the dispute to arbitration in London. On 19 October 2000, the parties jointly appointed a sole arbitrator. On 14 May 2002, the sole arbitrator rendered an award in favour of Viking Ship, who then applied for recognition and enforcement of the award before the Guangzhou Maritime Court (广州海事法院). Castelli did not raise any objections to the application. The Guangzhou Maritime Court opined that the award should be recognised and enforced. In particular, the court determined that the NYC was applicable since both the United Kingdom and China are Contracting Parties to the NYC and that the parties’ dispute related to a maritime commercial relationship according to Chinese law. The court found, with reference to Articles V(1) and V(2) NYC, that there were no grounds for refusing recognition and enforcement. Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=1490&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original PendingAdobe Acrobat PDF
Country China Court China, 广州海事法院 (Guangzhou Maritime Court) Date 17 October 1990 Parties Guangzhou Ocean Shipping Co., Ltd v. Marships of Connecticut Company Applicable NYC Provisions V Languages English Summary On 25 October, 7 November and 19 November 1988, Guangzhou Ocean Shipping Co., Ltd. (“Guangzhou Ocean Shipping”) entered into three charter-party agreements with Marships of Connecticut Company Limited (“Marships”) under which Guangzhou Ocean Shipping leased three shipping vessels to Marships. Marships failed to pay the freight dues. Guangzhou Ocean Shipping rescinded the three charter-party agreements and initiated ad hoc arbitration in London against Marships pursuant the arbitration clauses contained within the three charter-party agreements. Each party appointed an arbitrator that constituted the arbitral tribunal. On 7, 15 and 25 August 1989, three arbitral awards were rendered respectively in favour of Guangzhou Ocean Shipping. When Marships only effected partial satisfaction of the arbitral awards, Guangzhou Ocean Shipping applied on 6 July 1990 for recognition and enforcement of the arbitral awards before the Guangzhou Maritime Court (广州海事法院) in order to appropriate payment to a third company, China National Foreign Trade Corporation (“CNFTC”), owed to Marships. The Guangzhou Maritime Court opined that all three arbitral awards should be recognised and enforced. In particular, the court held that the application for recognition and enforcement had satisfied the necessary requirements and that there were no grounds for refusal under Article V NYC. In addition, the court found that the application for recognition and enforcement was filed within the required time limit prescribed under Chinese law. Accordingly, the appropriation of CNFTC’s payment to Marships could be regarded as property subject to enforcement. see also : Link to the record https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=1489&opac_view=6 Attachment (1)
Original UnavailableAdobe Acrobat PDF
